检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张丰赟 ZHANG Fengyun(School of Marxism,Changsha University,Changsha Hunan 410022,China)
机构地区:[1]长沙学院马克思主义学院,湖南长沙410022
出 处:《长沙大学学报》2025年第1期57-62,共6页Journal of Changsha University
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国经典诠释传统的理论化与现代化研究”(14ZDB006)。
摘 要:乾嘉考据学衰落后,中国经典诠释传统便进入“后乾嘉时代”,一直延续至中日甲午战争。在此时期,中国学者普遍思考的问题是总结、反思和批判乾嘉考据学,并在此基础上超越乾嘉考据学,构建新的经典诠释范式。中国经典诠释传统始终尝试内在地建构一套成熟、统一的经典诠释范式。但西学的强势传入打断了这一进程,宣告“后乾嘉时代”结束。从经典诠释的角度看,重构新的经典诠释范式,早已是中国学术的重要议题。After the decline of textual criticism of Qianjia era in Qing Dynasty,the Chinese hermeneutic tradition of classics entered the“Post-Qianjia era”and continued until the Sino-Japanese War.At this period,it has become a widely debated issue among Chinese scholars to summarize,reflect,and criticize textual criticism of Qianjia,attempting to surpass textual criticism of Qianjia to construct new paradigms for interpreting Chinese classics.The tradition of Chinese classic interpretation has always attempted to internally construct a mature and unified paradigm of classic interpretation.However,the forceful introduction of Western learning interrupted this process,marking the end of the“Post-Qianjia era”.From the perspective of classical interpretation,reconstructing a new paradigm of classical interpretation has long been an important issue in Chinese academia.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15