检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:梁青[1] LIANG Qing(Department of Foreign Languages,China Agricultural University,Beijing,100083)
出 处:《山西大同大学学报(社会科学版)》2025年第1期116-120,共5页Journal of Shanxi Datong University(Social Science Edition)
基 金:中国农业大学教改后立项项目“书面修正型反馈类型对英语写作准确性的影响”(WYXKY201804)。
摘 要:依据二语习得理论,探究了不同类型的书面修正型反馈对中国大学生英语写作准确性的影响。研究发现,对作文中的语言错误给予间接书面修正型反馈之后,再让学生进行纠正,有助于作文语言准确性的提高;直接反馈不能有效帮助学生提高作文的语言质量;整体书面修正型反馈对于提高作文的语言质量没有明显的作用;有必要要求学生对语言错误进行纠正,以提高作文的语言质量。Based on the theory of second language acquisition,this study explores the impact of different types of written corrective feedback on the accuracy of English writing among Chinese university students.Three results have been found in the study.First,students who corrected their texts after receiving indirect written CF improved their written accuracy.Second,direct written CF was not effective in improving written accuracy,due to students’lack of attention to their errors.Third,comprehensive written CF was not effective in improving written accuracy.Students should be encouraged to correct their errors after receiving indirect CF in order to improve their written accuracy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49