检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑智武[1] Zheng Zhiwu(Zhejiang Vocational Academy of Art,Hangzhou,Zhejiang,310053)
出 处:《民族艺术研究》2025年第1期141-150,共10页Ethnic Art Studies
基 金:2024年度国家社科基金艺术学重点项目“人工智能生成的表演艺术品知识产权制度研究”(项目批准号:24AH027)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:人工智能生成表演艺术品是人们利用人工智能系统而生成的一种表演艺术表达形式,其独创性源于AI机器学习对象,并非AI工作逻辑必然结果,具有人类情感互通性。国际法域对其独创性评判标准的价值取向呈现明显差异:欧盟预防性监管、美国自愿性鼓励、中国折中性平衡。对独创性的判断,需要分析人工智能生成表演艺术品的过程,并立足人工智能发展阶段生成表演艺术品的情势:初级AI生成的艺术品缺乏独创性,强AI和超AI生成的艺术品则具备了类人的独创性。此外,对独创性的判断进行审查性评判,需要按照形式逻辑分步骤评价、综合考量相关要素、对常见类型进行个案判断。Artificial Intelligence-generated performing arts is a form of performing arts expression generated by people using AI systems, and its originality originates from AI machine learning objects, is not the inevitable result of AI work logic, and has human emotional interoperability. The value orientation of the judgement standard of its originality in international jurisdictions shows obvious differences: preventive regulation in the EU, voluntary encouragement in the US, and eclectic balance in China. To judge the originality, it is necessary to analyze the process of generating performing arts by AI, and to base on the situation of generating performing arts at the stage of development of AI: artworks generated by primary AI lack originality, while artworks generated by strong AI and super AI have human-like originality. In addition, a critical appraisal of the judgement of originality requires a step-by-step evaluation according to formal logic, a comprehensive consideration of relevant elements, and a case-by-case judgement of common types.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222