论商业秘密民刑诉讼之间的衔接关系  

On the Convergence Relationship between Civil and Criminal Litigations in Trade Secret Cases

作　　者：刘铁光 Liu Tieguang

机构地区：[1]苏州大学王健法学院

出　　处：《知识产权》2025年第2期24-43,共20页Intellectual Property

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“知识产权民刑保护之法域冲突及其化解研究”(21BFX197)阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：民刑裁判之间的协调性、民刑诉讼对同一事实基于相同规则认定结果的互认以及基于不同规则认定结果的单向决定与重新认定是民刑交叉案件民刑诉讼之间的衔接准则。基于上述衔接准则,民刑诉讼对商业秘密构成条件的认定,应遵循互否与互认的衔接关系;对商业秘密侵害行为的认定,应遵循基于不同认定规则“刑—民”之间肯定的单向决定、“民—刑”之间否定的单向决定、“刑—民”之间否定的重新认定、“民—刑”之间肯定的重新认定以及基于相同证明标准结果互认的衔接关系;对侵权损失和商业秘密许可费的认定应遵循基于不同规则“刑—民”之间的单向决定、“民—刑”之间的重新认定以及基于相同规则认定结果互认的衔接关系。商业秘密民刑诉讼之间并不存在必须进行先后选择的先决关系,鉴于司法效率的考量,仅在民刑诉讼并行未决的场合选择刑事附带民事诉讼模式,其他情形民刑诉讼均无需中止。Convergence guidelines between civil and criminal litigations should be constituted of coordination between civil and criminal judgements,mutual recognition based on the results of the same rules,as well as one-way decision and re-determination based on the results of different rules between civil and criminal litigations of civil-criminal crossed case.Based on this kind of convergence guidelines,between civil and criminal litigation for the elements of trade secrets,the mutual denial and mutual recognition should be followed.For the determination of infringement of trade secrets on different rules,the one-way decision of affirmative determination between"criminal-civil"litigation and of negative determination between"civil-criminal"litigations and re-determination of affirmative determination between"civil-criminal"litigations and of negative determination between"criminal-civil"litigations should be followed,the determination of infringement of trade secrets on the same rule,the mutual recognition should be followed.For the determination of infringement losses and the license fees of trade secret based on different rules,the one-way decision between"criminal-civil"litigation and re-determination between"civil-criminal"litigations should be followed,and on the same rule,the mutual recognition should be followed.There is no prerequisite relationship between civil and criminal litigations for trade secret protection.In view of judicial efficiency considerations,only in the case of civil and criminal litigations in parallel pending procedures,civil suit collateral to criminal action should be chosen.Neither of civil and criminal procedures is required to suspend in all other cases.

关 键 词：商业秘密 民刑诉讼 商业秘密构成条件 侵权损失或获利 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学] D925.2[政治法律—法学]