科技异化及其克服:智能时代全球科技治理新向度  

Technological Alienation and Its Overcoming:A New Dimension of Global Science and Technology Governance in the Age of Intelligence

作　　者：查云龙 罗会钧[2] Zha Yunlong;Luo Huijun(Wenzhou Medical University,School of Marxism,Zhejiang,Wenzhou,325035;Central South University,School of Marxism,Hunan,Changsha,410083)

机构地区：[1]温州医科大学马克思主义学院,浙江温州325035 [2]中南大学马克思主义学院,湖南长沙410083

出　　处：《科技智囊》2025年第2期48-56,共9页Think Tank of Science & Technology

摘　　要：[研究目的]旨在深入探究智能时代科技异化现象对全球科技治理体系带来的挑战,并系统构建相应的治理策略与应对机制。[研究方法]采用现象学分析方法,揭示了科技异化的四维表征,即科技产品异化、科技创新风险、社会伦理冲击和科技霸权问题;并运用矛盾分析法,深入剖析了全球科技治理中的三重矛盾范式,包括“供给—需求矛盾”“大国合作—竞争矛盾”以及“科学—反科学矛盾”。[研究结论]面对现行全球治理体系在应对科技异化问题时显现的治理困境,本研究提出了“三维治理路径”:在物质层面,着力完善全球公共产品供给机制,提供更有效的全球公共产品;在制度层面,积极构建多边科技治理联盟,强化全球科技治理合作;在理念层面,通过科技伦理教育重塑“科技向善”价值共识,最终形成对科技异化的制度性扬弃与文明形态超越。[Research purpose]The study aims to thoroughly investigate the challenges posed by technological alienation in the intelligent era to the global science and technology governance system,and to systematically construct corresponding governance strategies and response mechanisms.[Research method]The research employs phenomenological analysis to systematically reveal the four-dimensional manifestations of technological alienation,namely the alienation of technological products,risks in technological innovation,impacts on social ethics,and issues of technological hegemony.It also utilizes contradiction analysis to deeply deconstruct the triple contradiction paradigms in global science and technology governance,including the“supply-demand contradiction”,“great power cooperation-competition contradiction”and“science-anti-science contradiction”.[Research conclusion]In response to the governance dilemmas revealed by the current global governance system in addressing technological alienation,this study proposes a“three-dimensional governance pathway”.At the material level,it focuses on improving the global public goods supply mechanism to provide more effective global public goods;at the institutional level,it actively constructs multilateral science and technology governance alliances to strengthen global cooperation in science and technology governance;at the conceptual level,it reshapes the value consensus of“technology for good”through science and technology ethics education,ultimately forming an institutional sublation and civilizational transcendence of technological alienation.

关 键 词：异化 科技异化 人工智能时代 全球科技治理 治理路径 

分 类 号：D815[政治法律—国际关系]