检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴晨妙 俞睿玮 Wu Chenmiao;Yu Ruiwei(College of Education,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou,Zhejiang,310012;Hangzhou Binjiang Platinum Coast Kindergarten,Hangzhou,Zhejiang,310051;College of Teacher Education,Huzhou Nonnol University,Huzhou,Zhejiang,313000)
机构地区:[1]浙江大学教育学院,浙江杭州310012 [2]杭州市滨江区白金海岸幼儿园,浙江杭州310051 [3]湖州师范学院教师教育学院,浙江湖州313000
出 处:《幼儿教育》2025年第9期15-19,共5页Early Childhood Education
基 金:浙江省哲学社会科学青年基金项a“学前儿童显性公平行为特征、动机及影响机制研究”的研究成果之一,项目批准号:19NDQN310YB。
摘 要:为探究在最后通牒博弈游戏中群体身份对3—6岁儿童公平分配行为的影响,本研究以杭州市1所幼儿园的%名3—6岁儿童为研究对象,了解其在最后通牒博弈游戏中对群体内、外成员进行资源分配的情况。结果发现:3—6岁儿童对群体内成员的资源分配数量随年龄增长而增加,更加趋于公平和利他分配;3—6岁儿童对群体外成员的资源分配数量无显著年龄差异,均以利己分配为主;从公平分配的是否率看,5—6岁女童更容易对群体内成员进行公平分配。To investigate the impact of group identity on fair allocation behavior of children aged 3—6 in ultimatum game,this study selected 96 children in the age bracket from a kindergarten in Hangzhou,China as the research subjects,and observed their resource allocation behavior towards in-group and out-group members in ultimatum game.The results showed that the amount of resource allocation towards in-group members increased with age,indicating a trend towards fair and altruistic allocation behavior among children aged 3—6.However,there was no significant age difference in the amount of resource allocation towards outgroup members,and children tended to allocate resources selfishly.In terms of the fairness allocation rate,girls aged 5—6 were more likely to allocate resources fairly towards in-group members.
分 类 号:G610[文化科学—学前教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38