检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:石利娟 浣炜欢 严超 郑惠丹 龚靖波 SHI Lijuan;HUAN Weihuan;YAN Chao;ZHENG Huidan;GONG Jingbo(School of Education,Hunan University of Science and Technology,Xiangtan 411201,China;School of Psychology and Cognitive Science,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200062,China;Changjun Middle School International Department,Changsha 410013,China;Shanghai Changning Mental Health Center,Affiliated Mental Health Center of East China Normal University,Shanghai 200335,China)
机构地区:[1]湖南科技大学教育学院,湘潭411201 [2]华东师范大学心理与认知科学学院,上海200062 [3]湖南省长沙市长郡中学国际部,长沙410013 [4]上海市长宁区精神卫生中心[华东师范大学附属精神卫生中心],上海200335
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2025年第1期1-7,共7页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基 金:湖南省教育科学规划课题研究成果(XJK22BXL002),“双减”后家长教育焦虑对子女心理健康的影响研究。
摘 要:目的:探究威胁性和剥夺性逆境与青少年进食行为问题的关系以及压力知觉和家庭亲密度在二者之间的作用。方法:采用童年逆境问卷、压力知觉量表、荷兰饮食行为问卷和家庭亲密度与适应性量表对931名中学生进行测量。结果:(1)威胁性逆境可以显著预测青少年的进食行为问题。(2)压力知觉分别在威胁性逆境、剥夺性逆境与青少年进食行为问题之间起中介作用。(3)在剥夺性逆境-压力知觉-进食行为问题路径中,家庭亲密度调节了后半段路径。具体而言,家庭亲密度越高,压力知觉对青少年进食行为问题的正向预测作用越弱。结论:威胁性逆境具有直接或通过压力知觉间接引发青少年进食行为问题的风险;剥夺性逆境通过压力知觉才能间接引发青少年进食行为问题。提高家庭亲密度可以缓冲剥夺性逆境-压力知觉-进食行为问题路径中压力知觉对青少年进食行为问题的影响。Objective:To explore the relationship between threatening and depriving adversity on adolescents'eating behavior problems,as well as the roles of perceived stress and family cohesion in this relationship.Methods:A question-naire survey was conducted with 931 middle school students using the childhood adversity questionnaire,the perceived stress scale,the Dutch eating behavior questionnaire,and the family cohesion and adaptability scale.Results:①Threatening adversity positively predicted eating behavior problems in adolescents.②Perceived stress played a significant mediating role in the relationship between threatening adversity and eating behavior problems,and depriving adversity and eating behavior problems in adolescents,respectively.③Inthedeprivingadversity-perceived stress-eatingbehavior problemme-diating model,family cohesion moderated the second half of the path of the mediation model.Specifically,the higher the level of family cohesion,the weaker the positive predictive effect of perceived stress on eating behavior problems in adolescents.Conclusion:Threatening adversity can directly or indirectly through perceived stress increase the risk of eating be-havior problems in adolescents;depriving adversity can indirectly increase the risk of eating behavior problems in adolescents through perceived stress,whereas increasing family cohesion levels can alleviate the effect of perceived stress on adolescents'eating behavior problems in the pathway from depriving adversity to eating behavior problems through perceived stress.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:160.79.109.31