社会科学主体性的理论建构——中国式现代化的精神叙事  

Theoretical Construction of Chinese Social Science Subjectivity:The Spiritual Narration of Chinese Modernization

作　　者：周晓虹[1] 彭圣钦 Zhou Xiaohong;Peng Shengqin

机构地区：[1]南京大学,南京210023 [2]南京大学社会学院,南京210023

出　　处：《浙江学刊》2025年第1期24-34,239,共12页Zhejiang Academic Journal

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目“重建以来的中国社会学学科发展与话语体系建设”(23ASH001)阶段性成果;南京大学“双一流”建设卓越研究计划“社会学理论与中国研究”项目(NJU-ZYR-01005)支持。

摘　　要：对中国社会科学主体性的呼唤意味着将作为研究客体的中国转化为研究主体,是破除西方社会科学知识霸权和发展中国特色哲学社会科学的必由之路。本文从基本动因和理论资源的角度,梳理并整合了既有的主体性论述,将其概括为历史主体性和文化主体性两种策略。前者不满于诸如传统/现代二分法等西方理论框架对纷繁复杂的中国历史和现实经验的切割,后者则不满于西方理论背后的文化预设对中国社会和文化传统的曲解。在此基础上,本文试图超越二者,提出另一种以中华文明为基础、以提供中国式现代化的理论叙事为目标的文明主体性策略。The call for the subjectivity of Chinese social sciences entails transforming China from a research object into the research subject,which is essential for breaking the hegemony of Western social science knowledge and developing philosophy and social sciences with Chinese characteristics.This paper summarizes and integrates existing discourses on the subjectivity of Chinese social sciences from the perspectives of fundamental motivations and theoretical resources,categorizing them into two strategies:historical subjectivity and cultural subjectivity.The former expresses dissatisfaction with Western theoretical frameworks,such as the traditional/modern dichotomy,which oversimplify China's complex history and practical experiences.The latter critiques the cultural assumptions behind Western social theories,which often distort Chinese society and cultural traditions.Moreover,this paper seeks to transcend these two strategies of subjectivity by proposing a third:the strategy of civilization subjectivity.Rooted in Modern Chinese Civilization,this approach aims to provide a theoretical narrative of Chinese modernization.

关 键 词：社会科学主体性 历史主体性 文化主体性 文明主体性 

分 类 号：C12[社会学]