检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:许松影 李钧鹏 Xu Songying;Li Junpeng
机构地区:[1]华中师范大学政治学与国家治理研究院,武汉430079 [2]华中师范大学社会学院,武汉430079
出 处:《浙江学刊》2025年第1期35-45,239,共12页Zhejiang Academic Journal
摘 要:“知识”定义的模糊性阻碍了知识社会学的发展。探索恰当的知识类型学,从研究对象角度将知识社会学加以系统化处理,有望改善这一问题。文章讨论社会学既有的多种知识分类,指出日常观念/专业知识的区分满足了系统化知识社会学的四条标准,进而考察日常观念/专业知识这组区分的不同形态,分析实用主义等流派对该区分的理解,总结其逻辑内涵。在此基础上,细化日常观念/专业知识的区分,结合既有的知识社会学研究,对该领域的相关议题做系统性分类,简述其中的八个重点部分。通过知识分类呈现知识社会学的基本结构,不仅是学科自反性的要求,也对知识社会学的未来具有重要意义。The ambiguity of the term"knowledge"has hindered the development of the sociology of knowledge.An appropriate typology of knowledge can help us to systematize the sociology of knowledge from the perspective of the object of study.This article first discusses the multiple established knowledge classifications in sociology,noting that the everyday ideas/specialized knowledge satisfies the four criteria of a systematic sociology of knowledge.It then examines the different forms of everyday ideas/specialized knowledge,analyzes the understanding of the classification in schools such as pragmatism,and summarizes the connotation of the classification.On this basis,it refines the distinction between everyday ideas/specialized knowledge and briefly describes eight areas of the sociology of knowledge by summarizing research topics.Systematizing the sociology of knowledge with the help of knowledge classification is both a manifestation of the discipline reflexivity and an important step for the future of the sociology of knowledge.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7