检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄广平 寇子明[1,2] 薛佳保 成爱明 HUANG Guangping;KOU Ziming;XUE Jiabao;CHENG Aiming(College of Mechanical Engineering,Taiyuan University of Technology,Taiyuan Shanxi 030024,China;National and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory for Mine Fluid Control,Taiyuan Shanxi 030024,China;Taiyuan BST Machine Electricity Liquid Engineering Co.,Ltd.,Jinzhong Shanxi 030699,China)
机构地区:[1]太原理工大学机械工程学院,山西太原030024 [2]矿山流体控制国家地方联合工程实验室,山西太原030024 [3]太原市博世通机电液工程有限公司,山西晋中030699
出 处:《机床与液压》2025年第4期171-177,共7页Machine Tool & Hydraulics
摘 要:传统履带牵引首绳更换装置液压提升系统通过利用平衡阀在液压回路中建立适当的反压力,用于实现负负载的平稳下降,但在轻载和时变负载的情况下会造成液压系统能耗大、效率低和发热严重等问题。为此,在传统液压提升系统中,通过采用图解法分析平衡阀先导比、设定压力等关键参数与系统能耗的关系,提出使用外部压力源流独立控制先导压力的方法控制平衡阀的开启,设计一种基于平衡阀先导压力独立控制的新型液压提升系统。利用液压系统仿真软件AMESim建立传统液压提升系统和新型液压提升系统的仿真模型,并对2种系统在首绳更换作业工况下进行仿真分析。仿真结果表明:新型液压提升系统具有明显的节能效果,相比传统液压提升系统,其节能效率可达78.24%。The counterbalance valve is used in traditional hydraulic lifting system of the crawler traction head rope replacement device to establish the appropriate back pressure in the hydraulic circuit,which is used to achieve the steady drop of negative load,but it can cause problems such as high energy consumption,low efficiency and serious heat generation in the case of light load and time-varying load.Therefore,in the traditional hydraulic lifting system,the relationship of key parameters such as counterbalance valve pilot ratio and setting pressure with system energy consumption was studied by using graphical method.A method of using the external pressure source to independently control the pilot pressure was proposed to control the opening of the counterbalance valve,and a new hydraulic lifting system was designed based on the independent control of the pilot pressure of the counterbalance valve.The hydraulic system simulation software AMESim was used to establish the simulation models of the traditional hydraulic lifting system and the new hydraulic lifting system respectively,and the two systems were simulated and analyzed in the head rope replacement working conditions.The simulation results indicate that:the new hydraulic lifting system has obvious energy-saving effect,compared with the traditional hydraulic lifting system,its energy-saving efficiency can reach 78.24%.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.58.157.160