检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王丽萍 WANG Li-ping
机构地区:[1]河南格森律师事务所
出 处:《河北法律职业教育》2025年第2期75-80,共6页HEBEI VOCATIONAL EDUCATION OF LAW
摘 要:在科技与司法融合的背景下,司法智能化建设,是提高法院审判质效的一种现实措施。而司法裁判的起点,则是事实认定。人工智能技术在民事诉讼案件事实认定的应用,能够有效降低司法成本,提高解决纠纷的效率。然而,现阶段民事诉讼案件在确定事实时有证据要求。因此,提出创新培育兼具法律与人工智能知识的复合型人才,为人工智能在民事诉讼案件事实判定中的运用储备人才力量等建议,目的是推动民事诉讼案件事实判定的智能化进程。Against the backdrop of the integration of technology and judiciary,the development of judicial intelligence is a practical measure to enhance the quality and efficiency of court trials.The starting point of judicial adjudication lies in fact-finding.The application of artificial intelligence technology in the determination of facts in civil litigation cases can effectively reduce judicial costs and improve the efficiency of dispute resolution.However,at the current stage,the determination of facts in civil litigation cases requires evidentiary support.Therefore,it is proposed to cultivate interdisciplinary talents with expertise in both law and artificial intelligence,thereby building a talent pool for the application of AI in fact-finding in civil litigation cases.These recommendations aim to promote the intelligentization of fact determination in civil litigation cases.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49