检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:史向蓉 SHI Xiangrong(People’s Public Security University of China,Beijing 100032)
机构地区:[1]中国人民公安大学,北京100032
出 处:《食品工业》2025年第2期341-346,共6页The Food Industry
摘 要:针对涉非法添加类减肥保健品案件处理中司法认定路径不统一、类似案件判决歧化的现象,笔者提炼归纳导致该现象的三个底层成因,即减肥保健品定性模糊、添加物危害性评价缺乏科学性和针对性以及主观明知推证困难。通过构建兼顾治疗目的与客观效能的定性逻辑、分类评估添加物危害,并基于现有司法解释与市场特点,笔者探索建立主观明知推定机制,旨在为类案处理提供更为系统、有据的理论支撑,从而强化对于非法添加类减肥保健品的刑法规制,以构建更为严密的食药管理体系。In view of the disunity of judicial determination path in the handling of cases involving illegal addition of weight-loss health care products and the disproportion of judgment in similar cases,the qualitative dilemma caused by the ambiguity of.the nature of weight-loss health care products,the lack of scientific and targeted evaluation of the harm of additives,and the subjective knowledge of the dificulty in proving three underlying causes were extracted and summarized.By constructing a qualitative logic that takes into account the therapeutic purpose and objective eficacy,classifying the harm of additives,and exploring the establishment of a subjective knowledge presumption mechanism based on the existing judicial interpretation and market characteristics,the aim is to provide a more systematic and evidence-based theoretical support for the handling of such cases,so as to strengthen the criminal law regulation on the illegal addition of weight-loss health products,so as to build a more rigorous food and drug management system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.152.135