马克思主义科学史学的基本内核及价值意蕴  

The Connotations and Value Significance of Marxist Historiography of Science

作　　者：李树雪 王博宇 LI Shu-xue;WANG Bo-yu(Institute for History of Science and Technology,Shanxi University,Taiyuan 030006,China)

机构地区：[1]山西大学科学技术史研究所,太原030006

出　　处：《自然辩证法研究》2025年第1期109-116,共8页Studies in Dialectics of Nature

基　　金：国家社会科学基金后期资助项目“科学史哲学研究”(19FZXB010)。

摘　　要：赫森、贝尔纳和李约瑟等学者创造性地运用马克思主义开展的科学史研究具有独特的风格和特征,形成了马克思主义科学史学派。基于这一学派的具体实践,进一步归纳马克思主义科学史学理论,即运用马克思主义的立场、观点与方法,阐释科学史是什么、如何认识科学发展的动力及如何研究科学史等元理论问题,以指导中国未来的科学史研究。马克思主义科学史学主张具体而多样化的科学史研究,与其他科学史学的观点相比凸显了对科学史的多元理解,认为科学是社会、经济的有机组成部分,从而消解了传统科学史的内、外史界线,具有丰富的学术内涵及鲜明的时代特征,不仅丰富和发展了科学史理论,也为新时代中国特色科学史的学术体系、学科体系、话语体系建设提供了理据。Using Marxism theory,Hussen,Bernal and Needham et al.had creatively conducted the research on the history of science with a unique style and characteristics,and thus formed the Marxist School of the history of science.Drawing on the concrete practices of this school,Marxist historiography of science is proposed as a guide for future research in the history of science.By employing the stand,viewpoint,and method of Marxism,we can explain what the history of science is,understand the driving force of scientific development,and implement research in the history of science and other meta-theoretical issues.The Marxist historiography of science advocates the concrete and diverse research methods,emphasizing the diversified understanding of the history of science by considering science as an integral part of society and economy,and eliminating the internal and external historical boundaries of the traditional history of science.In possessing of rich academic connotation and distinct epochal features,the Marxist historiography of science not only enriches and develops the theory on history of science,but also provides theoretical foundation for the construction of academic system,discipline system and discourse system of history of science with Chinese characteristics in the New Era.

关 键 词：马克思主义 科学史学 科学史 价值论 

分 类 号：N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]