穿透式审判思维在行政案件中的运用  

Application of Penetrating-trial Thinking in Administrative Cases

作　　者：曹磊 CAO Lei(School of law,Shandong Normal University,Ji'nan 250038,Shandong,China)

机构地区：[1]山东师范大学法学院,山东济南250038

出　　处：《扬州大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2025年第1期63-72,共10页Journal of Yangzhou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“裁判文书援引社会主义核心价值观说理的路径与方法研究”(21BFX164)。

摘　　要：为祛除形式司法、机械司法的积弊,努力实现矛盾纠纷实质性化解,穿透式审判思维应运而生。穿透式审判思维要求法官不局限于形式上的诉讼请求,而是透过现象看本质,探究深层法律关系和根本矛盾,争取一次性彻底解决纠纷或以释法方式向当事人提供正确的救济路径指引。就行政审判而言,如果仅就诉讼请求指向的行政行为进行审查无法实质化解纠纷,法官则可穿透被诉行政行为对行政争议进行全面审理,针对原告真实利益诉求探寻最佳裁决方案。在运用穿透式审判思维时,必须处理好积极与克制之间的平衡关系,在法律秩序和职责权限范围内谨慎作为,避免超越当事人诉讼请求和课以案外人责任的越权裁判发生。In order to eliminate the accumulated disadvantages of formal and mechanical justice,and to realize the substantive resolution of contradictions and disputes,the penetrating-trial thinking came into being.It requires judges not to be limited to the formal litigation request,but to see the essence through the phenomenon,explore the deep legal relationship and fundamental contradictions,and completely solve the dispute or provide the correct relief path guidance to the parties by means of interpreting the law.As far as administrative trial is concerned,if the dispute cannot be substantially resolved only by reviewing the administrative act directed by the lawsuit request,the judge can penetrate the sued administrative act to conduct a comprehensive trial of the administrative dispute and explore the best ruling plan for the plaintiff's real interest appeal.In the use of penetrating-trial thinking,we must balance the radical and restrained measures,act carefully within the scope of legal order and authority,and avoid the ultra judgment beyond the request of the parties and imposing the responsibility on the outsiders.

关 键 词：实质化解纠纷 行政诉讼 城市总体规划批复 穿透式审判思维 

分 类 号：D925[政治法律—诉讼法学]