艺术自律的辩证法:现代艺术的历史动力学  

The Dialectic of Artistic Autonomy——The Historical Dynamics of Modern Arts

作　　者：常培杰[1] Chang Peijie(School of Liberal Arts,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872)

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学文学院,北京100872

出　　处：《浙江社会科学》2025年第3期71-80,157,共11页Zhejiang Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“当代西方美学社会学转向问题研究”(项目编号:23&ZD233)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：就艺术发展的历史动力学问题而言,黑格尔最早在观念论维度进行了讨论,推动了美学的历史化。阿多诺、比格尔等马克思主义理论家则批判性继承了黑格尔的理论遗产,实现了此问题的历史唯物主义转化。其问题核心是艺术自律问题。艺术自律是现代世界合理化进程的结果,也是现代艺术展开自身的过程中最为关键的推动力。阿多诺认为,现代艺术的发展动力源自自律艺术与非艺术的辩证运动。比格尔则认为,构建自律艺术体制是现代主义艺术得以发生的内在动力,批判此体制则是先锋艺术得以发生和展开自身的动力。先锋艺术受益于席勒和浪漫派批判现代性后果的美学遗产。哈贝马斯则基于韦伯的合理化观念认为先锋派必然以失败告终。As far as the problem of the historical dynamics of artistic development is concerned,Hegel was the first to discuss it in the idealist philosophical dimension,which promoted the historicization of aesthetics.Marxist theorists such as Adorno and Peter Bürger,on the other hand,critically inherited Hegel’s theoretical legacy and realized the historical materialist transformation of this issue.The heart of the problem is the question of artistic autonomy.Artistic autonomy is the result of the rationalization process of the modern world and the most crucial driving force in the process of modern art unfolding itself.According to Adorno,the impetus for the development of modern art stems from the dialectical movement of autonomous art and non-art.According to Peter Bürger,the construction of an autonomous art system is the inner driving force of modernist art,while the critique of this system is the driving force of avant-garde art.The Avant-guard art benefited from the aesthetic legacy of Schiller and the Romantics who criticized the consequences of modernity.Habermas,on the other hand,argues that the avant-garde is bound to fail based on Weber’s notion of rationalization.

关 键 词：艺术自律 抽象 历史动力学 现代主义 先锋艺术 

分 类 号：G63[文化科学—教育学]