中医学在知识论意义上的合法性辩护  

Legitimacy Defense for Traditional Chinese Medicine on Theory of Knowledge

作　　者：张树剑[1] ZHANG Shujian(Institute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion,Chinese Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences,Beijing 100700,China)

机构地区：[1]中国中医科学院针灸研究所,北京100700

出　　处：《山东中医药大学学报》2025年第2期159-163,共5页Journal of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

基　　金：中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项(编号:ZZ-2023001)。

摘　　要：在近代中西医论争史上,中医一直处于自我辩护状态。本文回顾了中医学的辩护简史,提出之前的四种辩护方式:诉诸实用性、诉诸中医学理、诉诸认识论以及诉诸文化复兴。作者诉诸知识论,并在知识的构成、生产与传播三个场域为中医学作了合法性辩护,认为中医学知识具有很强的默会性与地方性,而且一直在生产与演变的过程中,同时知识存在解释权。中医学不必强求科学化,其保持自身的主体性才是重要的。In the history of the modern debate between Chinese and Western medicine,traditional Chinese medicine(TCM)has always been in a state of self-defense for legitimacy.This paper reviewed the brief history of defense for TCM and proposed the previous four defense approaches:appealing to practicality,appealing to theory of TCM,appealing to theory of knowledge,and appealing to Chinese cultural renaissance.Also,the author appealed to theory of knowledge,and implemented the defense in three fields of knowledge composition,knowledge production and knowledge dissemination,itemizing that the knowledge of TCM could be identified by strong tacit and local nature,and it is always on the way of variety and reproduction.At the same time,there are power facts influencing the knowledge interpretation and explanation.TCM does not have to be scientificated.What the most important is to maintain its own subjectivity and independence.

关 键 词：中西医论争 中医科学化 知识论 合法性辩护 

分 类 号：G122[文化科学]