海洋碳汇认购替代性修复的司法适用困境与规范路径  

Judicial Application Dilemma and Regulatory Path of Alternative Remediation of Marine Carbon Sink Subscription

作　　者：杨昊润 褚浩然 YANG Hao-run;CHU Hao-ran(Fujian Normal University,Fuzhou 350108,China;Northwest University of Political Science and Law,Xi’an 710122,China)

机构地区：[1]福建师范大学法学院,福建福州350108 [2]西北政法大学刑事法学院,陕西西安710122

出　　处：《黑龙江生态工程职业学院学报》2025年第2期86-91,共6页Journal of Heilongjiang Vocational Institute of Ecological Engineering

基　　金：2022年国家社科基金一般项目“能动检察视野下企业合规制度建构研究”(22BFX065)。

摘　　要：海洋碳汇认购作为一种新兴的替代性修复方式,是以司法赋能“双碳”战略目标实现的重要举措。我国尚未出台统一层面的法律规定,海洋碳汇认购的司法适用存在一定困境,具体表现为:司法适用定位模糊、司法适用方式混乱、司法适用效果不明。对此,应当在坚持修复性司法理念的基础上,厘清海洋碳汇认购的司法适用定位、统一海洋碳汇认购的适用条件、健全对海洋碳汇认购修复效果的评估和监督机制,从而规范海洋碳汇认购在司法实践中的适用。As an emerging alternative restoration method,the subscription of marine carbon sinks is an important initiative to realize the strategic goal of“dual-carbon”through judicial empowerment.China has not yet issued unified legislative provisions,there are certain difficulties in the judicial application of the subscription of marine carbon credits,which are specifically manifested in the following aspects:ambiguous positioning of the judicial application,confusing judicial application method,and unclear effect of the judicial application.In view of these problems,on the basis of the concept of restorative justice,we should clarify the positioning of the judicial application of the subscription of marine carbon sinks,unify the conditions for the application of the subscription of marine carbon sinks,and improve the assessment and supervision mechanism of the restoration effect of the subscription of marine carbon sinks,so as to standardize the application of the subscription of marine carbon sinks in judicial practice.

关 键 词：海洋碳汇认购 替代性修复 修复性司法 司法困境 规范路径 

分 类 号：D925[政治法律—诉讼法学] D922.68[政治法律—法学]