徐广所见《史记》异文考证五则  

Five Studies on the Different Writings in Shiji(《史记》)Seen by Xu Guang

作　　者：华营 Hua Ying(School of Literature,Shandong University,Ji’nan 250100,China)

机构地区：[1]山东大学文学院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《现代语文》2024年第12期36-42,共7页Modern Chinese

摘　　要：东晋徐广《史记音义》中的很多条目,都保存于裴骃的《史记集解》中。《史记音义》的一个重要价值是,保留了徐广之前大量的《史记》异文,今就其中的五条进行探讨。《五帝本纪》中,“合死生之说”中的“合”,应为原文前句“占”之讹字。从“鹿台”“廪台”在古代文献中的使用状况、得名缘由及古音关系等方面进行考察,《殷本纪》中的“鹿台”“廪台”应为两个地方,“鹿台”并非“廪台”。《秦本纪》中的“温骊”为“盗骊”之讹,“纤离”“駣骊”之“纤”“駣”,均为“盗”之假借字。《龟策列传》中,“诞谩”“訑谩”义通,扬雄《方言》中的“娗”当为“娫”字之误。《太史公自序》中,“迁亡”与“解亡”义近,相较而言,“迁亡”更符合《史记》原貌。At the end of the Eastern Jin dynasty,Xu Guang wrote the book ShijiYinyi(《史记音义》),the entries of which are mostly preserved in Pei Yin’s ShijiJijie(《史记集解》).A special feature of ShijiYinyi(《史记音义》)is that it preserves a large number of different writings from the Shiji(《史记》)before Xu Guang’s work,five of which are discussed today.In WudiBenji(《五帝本纪》),the term“he(合)”refers to the erroneous word“zhan(占)”in the previous sentence of the original text.We will investigate its use in literature,the reasons for its name,and the relationship between ancient sounds.In YinBenji(《殷本纪》),“lintai(廪台)”should not be“lutai(鹿台)”.In QinBenji(秦本纪),the“wenli(温骊)”is a mistake for“daoli(盗骊)”,while“xianli(纤离)”and“taoli(駣骊)”are borrowed words for“daoli(盗骊)”.In GuiceLiezhuan(《龟策列传》),the meanings of“danman(诞谩)”and“danman(訑谩)”are universal,but there is a mistake in Yang Xiong’s Fangyan(《方言》)where“tian(娗)”should be the word“yan(娫)”.In TaishigongZixu(《太史公自序》),the meaning of“qian(迁)”and“jie(解)”is similar,and“qian(迁)”is more in line with the original appearance of records of Shiji(《史记》).

关 键 词：徐广 《史记音义》 《史记集解》 《史记》 异文 考证 

分 类 号：I20[文学—中国文学]