墨子与马基雅维利的君主论思想对比研究  

A Comparative Study of Mozi and Machiavelli's Monarchist Thoughts

作　　者：张昊雷 杨梦真 Zhang Haolei;Yang Mengzhen

机构地区：[1]河南师范大学,河南新乡453007

出　　处：《现代交际》2025年第2期89-97,123,124,共11页Modern Communication

基　　金：河南省哲学社会科学规划年度项目“文化转型视域下的冯友兰文化观研究”(2024BZX010)。

摘　　要：《墨子》与《君主论》作为中西方极具代表性的著作,其蕴含的国家治理思想历经千年仍然璀璨生辉。虽然学界对这两部著作的研究已相当深入,但在系统比较其君主论思想方面尚存研究空间。通过对比研究中西方君主论可知,两者在立威担责、重节防患与聚民之力等方面具有共通之处。此外,两者在道权地位、君权轻重与为君之道等方面存在显著差异,揭示了中西方政治治理的不同根基。双重继承两者中的合理内核,可以更好地实现“古为今用”和“洋为中用”。Mozi and The Prince,as highly representative works of Chinese and Western thought,embody national governance ideas that remain brilliantly luminous through the millennia.Although academic research on these two works has been quite extensive,there is still ample room for exploring the systematic comparison of their theories on monarchy.Through comparative research on Chinese and western theories of monarchy,it can be seen that there are commonalities between the two in terms of establishing authority and taking responsibility,emphasizing thrift and preventing disasters,as well as mobilizing the power of the people.Furthermore,there are significant differences in their perspectives on the status of morality and power,the degree of emphasis on monarchical authority,and the principles of being a ruler,which highlight the distinct foundations of Chinese and Western political governance.By inheriting the reasonable cores of both,we can better realize the goals of“making the past serve the present”and“adapting foreign ideas to serve China”.

关 键 词：《墨子》 《君主论》 政治治理 对比研究 

分 类 号：B224[哲学宗教—中国哲学] D091[政治法律—政治学]