检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭鹤云 张辉 徐涛 Peng Heyun;Zhang Hui;Xu Tao(Department of Thoracic Surgery,Changzhou Jintan District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Changzhou 213200,Jiangsu Province,China)
机构地区:[1]常州市金坛区中医医院胸外科,江苏常州213200
出 处:《中外医药研究》2025年第5期66-68,共3页JOURNAL OF CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICINE AND PHARMACY RESEARCH
摘 要:目的:对比采用单孔与多孔胸腔镜肺癌根治术治疗非小细胞肺癌的效果。方法:按照随机数字表法,将常州市金坛区中医医院2021年3月—2024年3月收治的60例非小细胞肺癌患者分为单孔组(30例)和多孔组(30例)。单孔组采用单孔胸腔镜肺癌根治术治疗,多孔组采用多孔胸腔镜肺癌根治术治疗。对比两组围术期相关指标、炎性因子、并发症发生情况。结果:两组淋巴结清扫数量对比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);与多孔组比较,单孔组手术时间更长、术中出血量更少、住院时间更短(P<0.05)。术后2 d,两组C反应蛋白、白细胞介素-6以及肿瘤坏死因子-α水平升高,多孔组较单孔组高(P<0.05)。两组并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:与多孔胸腔镜肺癌根治术相比,单孔胸腔镜肺癌根治术耗时稍长,但其术中出血量更少、患者住院时间更短,可减轻术后炎性反应,不会增加并发症发生风险。Objective:To compare the efficacy of single-port and multi-port thoracoscopic radical resection in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.Methods:Sixty patients with non-small cell lung cancer admitted to Changzhou Jintan District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from March 2021 to March 2024 were randomly divided into a single-port group(n=30)and a multi-port group(n=30)using a random number table.The single-port group underwent single-port thoracoscopic radical resection,while the multi-port group underwent multi-port thoracoscopic radical resection.Perioperative indicators,inflammatory factors,and complications were compared between the two groups.Results:There was no significant difference in the number of lymph nodes dissected between the two groups(P>0.05).Compared with the multi-port group,the single-port group had a longer operative time,less intraoperative blood loss,and a shorter hospital stay(P<0.05).Two days postoperatively,the levels of C-reactive protein,interleukin-6,and tumor necrosis factor-αincreased in both groups,with higher levels observed in the multi-port group compared to the single-port group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:Compared with multi-port thoracoscopic radical resection,single-port thoracoscopic radical resection takes slightly longer but results in less intraoperative blood loss,a shorter hospital stay,and reduced postoperative inflammatory response without increasing the risk of complications.
关 键 词:非小细胞肺癌 单孔胸腔镜肺癌根治术 多孔胸腔镜肺癌根治术 炎性因子 术中出血量
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49