检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谈稼宇 Tan Jiayu
出 处:《中国文学批评》2025年第1期136-145,160,共11页Chinese Journal of Literary Criticism
摘 要:莎士比亚悲剧《哈姆雷特》中主人公的复仇延宕之谜是文学史上的经典问题,也构成了理解该人物形象塑造的重要切入点。以AI模型为对象,通过设计三阶段问题框架,重新审视这一难题,可以尝试对比AI文学批评与经典文学批评对人物形象的理解。相较黑格尔美学,AI技术在精确分析与客观评判上显长,却于哲学洞察的深度、全面视角及历时性理解上略逊一筹。当前,人工智能正在重塑人文社科图景,欲使其臻于完善,需在哲学思考、学科交融及伦理考量上寻求突破,以此推进“后学科”时代,让技术与人文相得益彰,共同推进文学解读达到新高度。The mystery of the delayed revenge of the protagonist in Shakespeare's tragedy Hamlet is a classic problem in literary history,and it also constitutes an important angle for understanding the creation of the character.Taking the two AI models Claude3Opus and GPT-4o as the object,by designing a three-stage problem framework,the author re-examines this problem and tries to compare the understanding of the character image by AI literary criticism and classical literary criticism.Compared with Hegel's aesthetics,AI technology is good at precise analysis and objective judgment,but it is slightly inferior in the depth of philosophical insight,comprehensive perspective and diachronic understanding.It is necessary to seek breakthroughs in philosophical thinking,interdisciplinary integration and ethical considerations,so as to let technology and humanities complement each other,and jointly promote literary interpretation to a new height.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.21.218