身体隐喻抑或共同存在?——共同体可能性问题刍议  

Body Metaphor or Co-existence? : Discussion on the Possibility of Community

作　　者：刘飞飞 LIU Feifei

机构地区：[1]山东大学文化传播学院,山东威海264209

出　　处：《孔子研究》2025年第1期108-119,159,160,共14页Confucius Studies

基　　金：山东省社会科学规划研究项目“比较诠释学视野下的魏晋玄学研究”(项目编号:24DZXJ02)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：以形塑共同体为指归的身体隐喻,主要表现为两种形式:一是基于肢体器官的“一体化”,赋予心或首支配地位,强调主从协调对于共同体良性运转的意义;二是基于身体与其活动空间的嵌套关系,将身体与共同体同构化,使身体生来就背负着诸种责任。近代以来出现了强调身体私有的声音,身体拒绝沾染各种共同体色彩。面对身体隐喻的渐趋失效,重思如何形塑共同体成为新的课题。生存处境可以成为形塑共同体活动得以开展的基础。共同的生存处境包含着人们勠力维系或改善共同存在的期待。惟在此种期待中,人们可朝向未来,共称“我们”。The body metaphor which used to shape community has two forms, one is to emphasize the “integration” of various limb organs, giving the heart or head a dominant position;another bases on the similarity between body structure and community operation mechanism to put together isomorphism, so the body is born with various responsibilities. However, both of two forms take hierarchy as the narrative condition. Since modern times, there has been a pursuit of privatization of the body, the body resisted the “unconditional inclusion” of the community stubbornly. So we should think about how to shape a community. The programme of public ownership of assets and making an ethic of role all cannot solve this problem. The programme about living situation could surpass the first two programmes. It can be the foundation of community. The common living situation ties people's fate to each other. People can strive to maintain and even improve the current situation of the community. When dealing with community affairs, people could collectively known as “we”. The “we” is neither based on physical aggregation nor spiritual integration.

关 键 词：身体隐喻 共同体 形塑 生存处境 共同存在 

分 类 号：B15[哲学宗教—世界哲学]