黄道周对古本《大学》的坚守——基于“格物”与“诚意”的考察  

Huang Daozhou’s Discussion of theAncient Version of The Great Learning and Its Characteristics

作　　者：高强 Gao Qiang

机构地区：[1]山东大学儒学高等研究院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《闽台文化研究》2024年第4期61-68,共8页Fujian-Taiwan Cultural Research

基　　金：山东省社会科学规划研究项目:“《知言》《学言》校注”(22CWTJ73)。

摘　　要：《大学》的今古本之争是“后朱子学时代”的重要事件,晚明黄道周对古本《大学》进行了义理上的疏通。对于“格物‘补传’”是否缺失的问题,黄道周对“身”“物”进行创造性诠释,使“格物”被包含在“本末”“治乱厚薄”之中,否定了“格物‘补传’”的必要性;对于“格物”与“诚意”的关系,黄道周基于对“吾身”和“此物”的独特阐释,使“诚意”进一步成为“格致”之“大关”,使古本《大学》在义理上得以疏通。黄道周认为古本《大学》本身便义理通达,整体结构浑然,并倡导古本《大学》,在《大学》的诠释史上颇具特色。The debate between the present and ancient versions of The Great Learningis a significant event in the post-Zhuzixue era.In the late Ming dynasty,Huang Daozhou focused on the two core issues of the ancient version of The Great Learning,making a rational clarification.Regarding the question of whether the“supplemental exposition on gewu(investigation of things)”was missing,Huang creatively reinterpreted the concepts of“the self”(shen)and“things”(wu),integrating gewu into the frameworks of"fundamental and incidental aspects"(benmo)and“order versus chaos,depth versus superficiality”(zhiluan houbo),thereby negating the necessity of such a supplement.On the relationship between gewu and"sincerity of intention"(chengyi),Huang developed unique interpretations of"the self"(wushen)and"these things"(ciwu),elevating chengyi as a pivotal"gateway"to the process of gezhi(investigation and knowledge extension).This allowed the ancient version of The Great Learning to achieve theoretical coherence.Huang argued that the ancient version inherently was of logical consistency and structural integrity,advocating for its authority.His approach holds distinctive significance in the interpretation history of The Great Learning.

关 键 词：黄道周 今古本《大学》 “知本知至” “诚意” 

分 类 号：B24[哲学宗教—中国哲学]