检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:路强 Lu Qiang(School of Philosophy,Sichuan Normal University,Chengdu 610068,China)
出 处:《晋阳学刊》2025年第2期110-116,共7页Academic Journal of Jinyang
摘 要:先秦法家思想由春秋时期的齐法家与战国时期的晋法家共同构成,二者亦共同形成了中国最早的“法治”理念。但是由于所处的历史背景和时代课题不同,齐法家与晋法家虽然在强调政治的公共性、直面人们趋利避害的自然本性等方面有着共同的立场,但也显示出了不同的特色,主要体现在要完成的历史使命、对于道德的定位与反思以及具体的政治实践的价值取向与运作手段。将两种法家思想进行系统的比较,不仅能够让我们更清晰地认识到法家思想的内在价值与逻辑线索,同时也能够为当代中国政治伦理建构寻找到来自自身历史传统的文化基因。In pre-Qin period,Legalists thought was composed of the Qi Legalists in the Spring and Autumn Period and the Jin Legalists in the Warring States Period,which together formed the earliest concept of"rule of law"in China.However,due to different historical backgrounds and issues of the times,although the legalists of Qi and Jin shared a common position in emphasizing the publicity of politics and facing people's natural nature of seeking advantages and avoiding disadvantages,they also showed different characteristics.It mainly includes the historical mission to be completed,the orientation and reflection on morality,and the value orientation and operation means of specific political practice.A systematic comparison between the two legalist thoughts can not only make us more clearly understand the inherent value and logical clues of legalist thoughts,but also find cultural genes from our own historical traditions for the construction of political ethics in contemporary China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.14.249.217