检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘灏 费振乐 郝远翔 郑杰[2] 孙宇 LIU Hao;FEI Zhenle;HAO Yuanxiang;ZHENG Jie;SUN Yu(School of Biomedical Engineering,Anhui Medical University,Hefei Anhui 230032;Radiotherapy Center,Wanbei Coal Electricity Group General Hospital,Suzhou Anhui 234000;Department of Radiation Oncology,The 901 Hospital of the Joint Service Support Force of PLA,Hefei Anhui 230031,China)
机构地区:[1]安徽医科大学生物医学工程学院,安徽合肥230032 [2]皖北煤电集团总医院放疗中心,安徽宿州234000 [3]中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九〇一医院放疗科,安徽合肥230031
出 处:《蚌埠医科大学学报》2025年第2期186-190,共5页Journal of Bengbu Medical University
基 金:安徽省宿州市科技计划项目(SZSKJJZC040);安徽省宿州市自筹资金项目(SZZCZJ202218)。
摘 要:目的:分析基于背景剂量优化法在前列腺癌序贯放疗计划设计中的可行性及优缺点。方法:选取前列腺癌病人10例,在Monaco计划系统上设计首程计划(靶区,PTV 50.4 Gy,28次),然后分别按照常规方法(Normal组)和基于背景剂量优化法(Bias Dose)(Bias组)设计再程计划(肿瘤区,GTV 16 Gy,8次),比较分析靶区和危及器官的剂量以及机器跳数和执行时间。结果:2种计划设计方法靶区剂量均可满足临床要求。在GTV、PTV中,Bias组的D 98、D_(mean)、D 2剂量均低于Normal组(P<0.01),在PTV的TC剂量差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);在HI方面,对于GTV靶区Bias组呈劣势,对于PTV靶区Bias组均匀性优于Normal组(P<0.05和P<0.01);Bias组在所有靶区上的CI均高于Normal组(P<0.01)。Bias组与Normal组机器跳数和执行时间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。在小肠D_(mean)、左右股骨D_(mean)、直肠V 50剂量指标方面,Bias组明显低于Normal组(P<0.05~P<0.01)。结论:Bias Dose方法在前列腺癌序贯放疗中可行,在临床应用中应采用Bias Dose计划以取得更优的临床计划。Objective:To analyze the feasibility,advantages,and disadvantages of background dose optimization method in sequential radiotherapy planning for prostate cancer.Methods:Ten patients with prostate cancer treated were selected,and the first course plan(PTV 50.4 Gy/28 fractions)was designed on the Monaco planning system.Then,the second course plan(GTV 16 Gy/8 fractions)was designed according to the conventional method and the background dose optimization method(Bias Dose),respectively.The doses of target and organs at risk,monitor unit and deliver time were compared and analyzed.Results:The target dose of two plan design methods met clinical requirements.In GTV and PTV,the D 98,D_(mean),and D 2 doses in the Bias group were lower than those in the Normal group(P<0.01),and there was a statistically significant difference in TC dose of PTV(P<0.01).In terms of HI,the Bias group in the GTV target area showed a disadvantage,while the Bias group in the PTV target area showed better uniformity than the Normal group(P<0.05 and P<0.01).The CI of the Bias group was higher than that of the Normal group in all target areas(P<0.01).There was no statistically significant difference in machine hop count and execution time between the Bias group and the Normal group(P>0.05).Regarding small intestine D_(mean),left and right femur D_(mean),and rectal V 50 dose indicators,the Bias group was significantly lower than the Normal group(P<0.05 to P<0.01).Conclusions:Bias Dose method is feasible in sequential radiotherapy of prostate cancer.Bias dose plan should be used in clinical application to obtain better clinical plan.
关 键 词:前列腺肿瘤 Monaco计划系统 背景剂量优化法 序贯放疗
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.52