中西方反间谍法对比及对曲解我国立法言行的应对  

Misinterpretation of China's Legislation and Its Countermeasures

作　　者：海浩 HAI Hao(China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations,Beijing 100081,China)

机构地区：[1]中国现代国际关系研究院,北京100081

出　　处：《江南社会学院学报》2024年第4期20-26,共7页Journal of Jiangnan Social University

摘　　要：中西方国家都注重开展反间谍立法,为防范、制止和惩治间谍行为提供法律依据。美西方国家较早开展反间谍立法,且经多次修订,持续丰富完善反间谍立法。百年变局下,我国面临严峻的间谍风险隐患,为适应新时期反间谍工作需要,2023年对《中华人民共和国反间谍法》做出修订完善。一些境外势力抹黑曲解我国《中华人民共和国反间谍法》,炮制我国营商环境恶化言论。通过对比中西方反间谍法的立法类型、间谍行为界定和执法量刑等方面内容,可以为我国反间谍立法提供客观公正的认识视角,并提出应对曲解的建议。Both China and western countries attach importance to counter-espionage legislation so as to provide legal foundation for preventing,stopping and punishing espionage.The western countries including the United States started this task earlier and laws in this respect were amended several times and continually enriched and completed.Under the situation of great changes not experienced for the last 100 years China is facing serious espionage risks including hidden threats and thus the Counter-Espionage Law was revised in 2023 to meet the needs of counterespionage in the new era.Some foreign forces try to smear and distort China's Counter-Espionage Law and fabricate claims that China's business environment is deteriorating.In the face of misinterpretation and by comparing the legislative types,the definition of espionage behavior,law enforcement and sentencing between Chinese and western counterespionage laws,we intend this paper to project an objective and fair understanding of China's counter-espionage legislation,and put forward advice to deal with misinterpretation in this regard.

关 键 词：中西方国家 反间谍立法 对比 曲解 应对 

分 类 号：D922.14[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]