胡居仁《居业录》版本新探  

A New Probe into the Edition of Hu Juren’s Ju Ye Lu

作　　者：佟雨恒 TONG Yu-heng(Institute of Advanced Confucianism,Shandong University,Jinan 250100,China)

机构地区：[1]山东大学儒学高等研究院,济南250100

出　　处：《山东青年政治学院学报》2025年第2期50-62,共13页Journal of Shandong Youth University of Political Science

摘　　要：关于明代思想家胡居仁的主要著作《居业录》,学界以往少有专门的版本研究。然而无论是现代的几种点校本所选之底本,还是学者研究常用之本,多不是最佳版本。通过梳理《居业录》的刊刻情况,可知其最重要的版本为明万历四卷本、清正谊堂本八卷本与乾隆二十二年乡刻十二卷本三种;而通过对比三种主要版本的异同,可知万历本才是最佳版本。但以往被使用最多的却是对于原本改动最大的正谊堂本,导致了不少对胡氏思想的误读。另外,学界常用的《明儒学案》所引胡居仁之语录亦有不少删改之处,对于正确认识胡氏思想同样是一道阻碍。Scholarship on the Ju Ye Lu(居业录,Records of Cultivating Virtue),the main work of Ming Dynasty thinker Hu Juren,has historically lacked dedicated studies on its textual editions.However,many of the editions are not the most reliable,whether they are the base books selected by several modern punctuated editions or the books commonly used by scholars.By sorting out the publication history of Ju Ye Lu,it can be seen that the most important editions are the four-volume Wanli edition from the Ming Dynasty,the eight-volume Zhengyitang edition from the Qing Dynasty,and the twelve-volume rural edition from the 22nd year of the Qianlong reign(1757).A comparison of the three main editions reveals that the Wanli edition is the best.Nevertheless,in the past,the Zhengyitang edition,which underwent the most extensive modifications in the original edition,has been the most widely used,leading to many misunderstandings about Hu’s thoughts.In addition,the quotations of Hu Juren in Mingru Xue’an(明儒学案,The Records of Ming Scholars),commonly used in academic circles,contain many deletions and alterations,further hindering the correct understanding of Hu’s thoughts.

关 键 词：胡居仁 《居业录》 版本 

分 类 号：B248.99[哲学宗教—中国哲学]