基于语料库的新华网与《纽约时报》涉加沙地区报道批评话语分析  

Corpus-Based Critical Discourse Analysis of Gaza Coverage in Xinhuanet and The New York Times

作　　者：胡高檔 HU Gao-dang(Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang,Jiangxi 330000)

机构地区：[1]江西师范大学,江西南昌330000

出　　处：《江西电力职业技术学院学报》2024年第10期92-96,101,共6页Journal of Jiangxi Vocational and Technical College of Electricity

摘　　要：加沙地区的战事状况受到全球关注。以新华网及《纽约时报》2024年6月份关于加沙地区的报道为语料来源,借助Fairdough的三维话语分析框架,对《纽约时报》涉加沙报道开展批评话语分析。在文本层面,《纽约时报》通过使用特定词汇夹带美国意识形态,导致读者关于加沙地区局势产生认知偏差,新华社则会批评美国的伪善;在话语实践层面,《纽约时报》的引用更加政治化,更具有美国倾向,而新华网报道则更具有全球观;在社会实践层面,《纽约时报》涉加沙地区报道体现了美国党派在立场上的差异。研究认为,《纽约时报》新闻报道政治意味浓厚,读者应当辩证看待此类新闻。此研究对新闻从业者及读者具有一定的借鉴意义。The ongoing conflict in Gaza has drawn global attention.This study conducts a critical discourse analysis of June 2024 Gaza-related reports from Xinhuanet and The New York Times using Fairclough’s three-dimensional framework.Textually,The New York Times incorporates American ideology through lexical selection,potentially causing cognitive bias,whereas Xinhuanet criticizes Western double standards.Discursively,The New York Times exhibits politicalized citations with U.S.orientation,contrasting with Xinhuanet's global perspective.Socially,the American coverage reflects partisan differences.The findings suggest The New York Times'politically charged reporting necessitates readers'dialectical analysis.This research holds referential value for journalists and audiences.

关 键 词：加沙 新闻报道 批评话语分析 语料库研究 

分 类 号：G212[文化科学—新闻学] H15[语言文字—汉语] H315