检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋满金 SONG Man-jin(Nanjing University of Technology,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210000)
机构地区:[1]南京工业大学,江苏南京210000
出 处:《司法警官职业教育研究》2024年第4期48-56,共9页Vocational Education Research of Judicial Police
摘 要:自动驾驶技术迅速发展的同时,不可避免地带来了一系列新的刑事法律问题。其系统分级化、智能化等特点让相对滞后的法律规范体系应对乏力。在一起自动驾驶汽车引发的交通事故中,传统《刑法》很难认定除了驾驶者,还有哪些主体应当承担哪些刑事责任。为此,较好的选择是将关注点放在主体所负的注意义务上。通过明确不同自动驾驶情形中应负注意义务的主体、分析注意义务的限缩及扩展事由以及相应边界,达到合理分配各方主体的注意义务的目的,同时,对于厘清自动驾驶交通肇事主体的刑事法律责任具有一定的现实意义。With the rapid development of autonomous driving technology,a series of new criminal legal issues have inevitably emerged.The hierarchical and intelligent characteristics of its system make it difficult for the relatively lagging legal regulatory systemto cope.In a traffic accident caused by autonomous vehicle,it is difficult for the traditional criminal law to determine which subjects should bear which criminal responsibilities in addition to the driver.For this reason,a better choice is to focus on the duty of care that the subject bears.By clarifying the subjects who should bear the duty of care in different situations of autonomous driving,analyzing the reasons for the limitation and expansion of the duty of care,and the corresponding boundaries,the goal of reasonably allocating the duty of care among all parties can be achieved.At the same time,it has certain practical significance for clarifying the criminal legal responsibility of the subjects involved in autonomous driving traffic accidents.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.138.140.5