机构地区:[1]首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院,北京同仁眼科中心,眼科学与视觉科学北京市重点实验室,北京100730
出 处:《眼科》2025年第2期152-156,共5页Ophthalmology in China
摘 要:目的比较IOLMaster 700和Pentacam AXL在测量FS-LASIK术后眼的全角膜曲率及SimK的差异性和一致性。设计诊断技术评价。研究对象行FS-LASIK手术的近视患者89例(89眼)。方法分别使用IOLMaster 700和Pentacam AXL进行测量,记录IOLMaster 700中的拟合角膜屈光力SimK1、SimK2、全角膜屈光力(TK1、TK2),Pentacam AXL中的SimK1、SimK2、角膜净屈光力(TNP K1、TNP K2)、总角膜屈光力(TCRP K1、TCRP K2)。采用配对t检验比较两种仪器获得的同一参数的差异性。使用Bland-Altman图评估两种仪器获得的同一参数的一致性。主要指标SimK1、SimK2、TK1、TK2、TNP K1、TNP K2、TCRP K1、TCRP K2,Bland-Altman分析中的95%一致性界限(LoA)和95%LoA范围内点。结果IOLMaster700测量的SimK1、SimK2分别为(37.36±1.62)D、(38.12±1.67)D,与Pentacam AXL测量的(37.33±1.68)D、(38.01±1.75)D无统计学差异(t=0.546、1.552,P=0.586、0.124)。IOLMaster700测量的TK1为(36.60±1.81)D,大于Pentacam AXL测量的TNP K1(35.50±1.70)D(t=13.072,P<0.001)和TCRP K1(35.82±1.85)D(t=9.202,P<0.001);IOLMaster700测量的TK2为(37.25±1.87)D,大于Pentacam AXL测量的TNP K2(36.13±1.70)D(t=12.829,P<0.001)和TCRP K2(36.41±1.79)D(t=10.205,P<0.001)。SimK1、SimK2、TK1-TNP K1、TK2-TNP K2、TK1-TCRP K1和TK2-TCRP K2在两台设备之间的95%(LoA)分别为-1.3~1.3 D、-1.2~1.5 D、-0.6~2.8 D、-0.6~2.9 D、-0.9~2.5 D和-0.8~2.5 D。95%LoA内的点数分别为84(94.4%)、84(94.4%)、84(94.4%)、84(94.4%)、82(92.1%)和85(95.5%)。结论IOLMaster 700与Pentacam AXL测量SimK1、SimK2数值一致性较好,结果可以互换使用。测量TK1、TK2、TNP K1、TNP K2、TCRP K1、TCRP K2虽一致性相对较好,但数值有一定差异,结果不建议互换使用。Objective To compare the differences and agreement of IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam AXL in measuring Total keratometry and SimK in patients after FS-LASIK.Design Diagnostic technique evaluation.Participants A total of 89 patients(89 eyes)with myopia who underwent FS-LASIK surgery at the Refractive Surgery Center of Beijing Tongren Hospital.Methods The following parameters were recorded:SimK1,SimK2,Total K1(TK1),and Total K2(TK2)from IOLMaster 700;and SimK1,SimK2,TNP K1,TNP K2,TCRP K1,and TCRP K2 from Pentacam AXL.Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the consistency between the two devices.Paired t-tests were performed to compare the differences in the same parameters obtained by the two measurement instruments.Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the consistency between the two devices.Main Outcome Measures SimK1,SimK2,TK1,TK2,TNP K1,TNP K2,TCRP K1,TCRP K2.Results The SimK1 and SimK2 measured by the IOLMaster 700 were(37.36±1.62)D and(38.12±1.67)D,respectively,showing no statistically significant difference compared to the measurements by Pentacam AXL,which were(37.33±1.68)D and(38.01±1.75)D(t=0.546,1.552;P=0.586,0.124).The TK1 measured by IOLMaster 700 was(36.60±1.81)D,which was greater than the TNP K1(35.50±1.70)D(t=13.072,P<0.001)and TCRP K1(35.82±1.85)D(t=9.202,P<0.001)measured by Pentacam AXL.Similarly,the TK2 measured by IOLMaster 700 was(37.25±1.87)D,greater than the TNP K2(36.13±1.70)D(t=12.829,P<0.001)and TCRP K2(36.41±1.79)D(t=10.205,P<0.001)measured by Pentacam AXL.The 95%limits of agreement(LoA)for SimK1,SimK2,TK1-TNP K1,TK2-TNP K2,TK1-TCRP K1,and TK2-TCRP K2 between the two devices were-1.3~1.3 D,-1.2~1.5 D,-0.6~2.8 D,-0.6~2.9 D,-0.9~2.5 D,and-0.8~2.5 D,respectively.The number of points within the 95%LoA were 84(94.4%),84(94.4%),84(94.4%),84(94.4%),82(92.1%),and 85(95.5%),respectively.Conclusion The measurements of SimK1 and SimK2 between the IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam AXL showed good consistency,and the results can be used interchangeably.Although the measurements of TK1,TK2,TNP K1,TNP K2
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...