检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周青[1,2] 高延孝 杨伟[1] ZHOU Qing;GAO Yanxiao;YANG Wei(School of Management,Hangzhou Dianzi Universtiy,Hangzhou 310018,China;Experimental Center of Data Science and Intelligent Decision Making,Hangzhou Dianzi Universtiy,Hangzhou 310018,China)
机构地区:[1]杭州电子科技大学管理学院,杭州310018 [2]杭州电子科技大学数据科学与智能决策实验中心,杭州310018
出 处:《科学学与科学技术管理》2025年第2期76-93,共18页Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71932005,71874046)。
摘 要:面向“一带一路”企业技术标准联盟的高绩效对中国企业技术标准高质量“走出去”具有重要作用。然而,面向“一带一路”企业技术标准联盟具有非常复杂的伙伴结构和面临着相当不稳定的外部环境,建立有效的联盟治理方式就成为了保障联盟绩效的关键问题。选择40个具有典型代表性的联盟作为研究对象,以联盟绩效为治理目标,采用fsQCA方法分析“共商共建共享”治理理念下联盟治理方式影响联盟绩效的因果复杂机制以及治理方式、经济环境以及项目存续时间的互动关系。结果表明,“共建共享”型联盟治理和“共商共享”型联盟治理是面向“一带一路”企业技术标准联盟治理的两种主要方式。结合实践案例,进一步分析联盟主要治理方式的基本组态对联盟绩效的作用机制,厘清了它们之间的内在逻辑关系。The establishment of high-performance technology standards alliances oriented towards the"Belt and Road"Enterprise Technical Standard Alliance(BRTSA)plays a crucial role in the high-quality internationalization of Chinese enterprise technology standards.However,in the actual operation of these alliances,uncertainties in environment and behavior,diversity of partners and resources,and complexities in structure and connections can lead to instability in alliance composition.Effective governance methods are key to ensuring alliance performance.Existing theories,including transaction cost economics,resource dependence theory,and social contract theory,have proposed three alliance governance methods:equity governance,contractual governance,and relational governance.Nevertheless,these methods fall short of meeting the governance needs of BRTSA,which have more complex member structures and face more intricate internal and external environments.Collaborative governance theory offers a research paradigm for effective interaction among heterogeneous actors,while the"Consultation,Contribution,and Shared Benefits"governance concept provides guidelines for collective action among diverse governance actors,offering new perspectives and principles for constructing new alliance governance methods.Based on this,an analytical framework for alliance collaborative governance under the guidance of the"Consultation,Contribution,and Shared Benefits"governance concept was constructed.It explores three collaborative governance methods for BRTSA,namely,governance methods dominated by the concepts of"Consultation",'Contribution",and"Shared Benefits".These three collaborative governance methods interact with the economic environment and project duration,forming a complex system that jointly influences alliance performance.Consequently,40 typically representative alliances were selected as research subjects,with alliance performance as the governance goal.The fsQCA(fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis)method was employed to explore the
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.220.9.180