检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李杨[1] 许庆瑞[2] Li Yang;Xu Qingrui(Zhejiang Institute of Informatization Development,Hangzhou Dianzi University,Hangzhou 310018,China;School of Management,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China)
机构地区:[1]杭州电子科技大学浙江省信息化发展研究院,浙江杭州310018 [2]浙江大学管理学院,浙江杭州310058
出 处:《科技进步与对策》2025年第6期151-160,共10页Science & Technology Progress and Policy
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(71572177,72174005);浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题项目(23NDJC159YB)。
摘 要:制度是影响企业创新能力发展的关键因素。如何从制度理论视角解读企业创新能力发展特征是创新管理研究关注的重点。随着相关研究数量持续增长,该领域呈现理论起点多元化、研究层次单一化趋势,导致不同研究间缺乏理论对话、系统性联系不强等问题,无法充分解释相同制度环境中企业创新能力发展方向异质化现象。因此,有必要对制度研究领域不同理论流派的创新能力研究进行系统梳理,剖析现有研究解释力不足的具体表现与理论根源,并寻求更具包容性的理论视角。因此,从创新能力发展的动态性和独特性入手,提出创新能力发展的两个维度与4个方向,重点探讨不同流派的制度研究在剖析创新能力发展特征上的优势与局限。在此基础上,提出以制度逻辑观为元理论,开展后续制度与创新能力发展研究的必要性、可行性及理论意义,分析制度逻辑观与创新能力理论发展研究相结合的理论接口,并从理论构建机遇与情境化研究机遇两个方面展望未来研究方向。Institutions are one of the most important factors that affect firms'innovation capability.There has been a long tradition for management researchers to discuss innovation relevant topics from an institutional perspective,especially how to interpret the development phenomenon of firms'innovation capability has been the focus of innovation researchers.However,there have been some academic inadequacies.First,researchers usually carry out analyses on a diversified theoretical basis,all of which belong to institutional theory in a broad sense.However,the diversity makes it challenging to form an effective theoretical dialogue between different schools of research.Second,the analysis of institutions has been generally limited to the macro-or meso-level,and cross-level research is missing.Third,the embeddedness of firms in an institutional context is emphasized in the existing research,but the agency of firms in the process of innovation capability development has not received enough attention,leading to an insufficiency in terms of theoretical explanatory power.Therefore,it is necessary to systematically review these different research schools and further look for a more inclusive theoretical perspective that can help solve the problems mentioned above.This study starts with a review of the conceptual connotation and theoretical origin of innovation capability development.Then,the discussion of dynamic and unique dimensions of firms'innovation capability development is conducted,and four development modes of firms'innovation capability are analyzed considering the variation in these two dimensions mentioned before.These four modes are inertial development mode,reconstructive development mode,isomorphic development,and heterogeneous development mode.In the second part,a systematic sorting of different schools of literature is conducted,including explanations from comparative political economy,neo-institutional economics,and neo-institutionalism.The study summarizes and compares the advantages and limitations of current
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.12.164.78