怎么继续往下想?——对佩里·安德森教授演讲的回应  

How to Advance Further in Thinking?:A Response to Professor Perry Anderson’s Lecture

作　　者：王晓明[1] Wang Xiaoming

机构地区：[1]上海大学文化研究系暨中文系,上海200444

出　　处：《华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2025年第2期17-21,178,共6页Journal of East China Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)

摘　　要：佩里·安德森指出,所谓“国际法”乃是欧洲中心主义的产物,并常为帝国强权所用。认清这一事实后如何接着思考,以回应世界和中国当下的各种思想与问题显得尤为重要。回顾历史,中国第一批现代思想家如王韬、杨度、严复等在倡导向西方学习时,并未将西方视为文明最优代表,而是充满困惑与矛盾。张君劢、梁启超等则开始重新思考中西文化关系,思想焦点转向“是否有可能改变世界的野蛮规则”,鲁迅、孙中山等则提出避免中国在现代化过程中变成“兽性爱国者”的方法。现在看来,现代早期中国思想的理想并未完全实现,当今世界仍然呈现“野蛮化”趋势,但越是如此,越不能因他人“野蛮”而放弃追求“文明”和全球正义。Perry Anderson points out that the so-called“international law”is a product of Eurocentrism and is often utilized by imperial powers.Having recognized this fact,it becomes particularly important to delve further into thinking about how to respond to various ideologies and issues in today’s China and world as a whole.Looking back at the pioneering modern Chinese thinkers like Wang Tao,Yang Du,and Yan Fu,we see that their advocacy for learning from the West did not stem from a belief that the West was the pinnacle of civilization.Rather,they were characterized by a sense of confusion and internal contradictions.Zhang Junmai and Liang Qichao began to reassess the cultural relationship between China and the West,shifting their intellectual focus toward questioning“whether it’s possible to alter the world’s barbaric norms”.Meanwhile,Lu Xun and Sun Yat-sen explored strategies to prevent China from embracing a form of“barbaric patriotism”during its modernization journey.It seems that the aspirations of early modern Chinese thought have yet to be fully realized,and currently,the world exhibits a troubling trend towards“barbarization”.However,this very trend underscores the necessity for us not to abandon our pursuit of“civilization”and global justice,despite the existence of“barbarism”elsewhere.

关 键 词：国际法 欧洲中心主义 中国现代思想 丛林法则 全球正义 

分 类 号：G63[文化科学—教育学]