常识在司法裁判方法中的运用价值  

The Value of Common Knowledge in Judicial Adjudication Methods

作　　者：黄金兰[1] HUANG Jinlan(School of Law,Xiamen University,Xiamen 361005,Fujian)

机构地区：[1]厦门大学法学院,福建厦门361005

出　　处：《厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2025年第2期154-166,共13页Journal of Xiamen University(A Bimonthly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“司法评鉴的应然逻辑及制度构造”(22FFXA003)。

摘　　要：在司法裁判的各主要方法中,常识都展现出独特的意义和价值。就法律发现而言,常识是法律的社会渊源,也是法律外部发现的重要场所。通过常识,法官不仅能清晰地阐明法律模糊,还能有效地填补法律漏洞。就法律解释而言,常识使当然解释成为可能:通过常识,法官不仅可以捕捉到法律的规范意旨,还能更好地探寻事物的本质。就法律论证而言,常识是法律论证的重要依凭:以常识为依据的法律论证,不仅可以克服形式逻辑的刻板与僵化,使法律决定在合法性与合理性之间实现均衡,还能避免法律论证走向过度修辞,从而限制法官专断。Common knowledge plays a vital role in judicial adjudication methods.From the perspective of legal discovery,it serves as both a social resource for law and a source for judges to seek norms beyond legal texts,enabling them to clarify ambiguities and address gaps in the law.In terms of legal interpretation,common knowledge facilitates natural interpretation,allowing judges to discern the legislative intent and explore underlying truths.From the standpoint of legal argumentation,it provides a foundation for both internal and external justification.Unlike rigid legal logic,common knowledge offers an empirical approach that helps balance legality with legitimacy,thereby preventing the misuse of arbitration through excessive rhetoric.

关 键 词：常识 司法裁判 法律渊源 当然解释 法律论证 

分 类 号：D920.0[政治法律—法学]