检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡安琪 HU Anqi(School of Public Policy&Management,Anhui Jianzhu University,Hefei,Anhui,230022)
机构地区:[1]安徽建筑大学公共管理学院,安徽合肥230022
出 处:《南京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2025年第2期65-74,共10页Journal of Nanjing University of Science and Technology:Social Sciences
基 金:安徽省社会科学创新发展研究课题“法治赋能安徽省城市更新立法体系与模式研究”(2023CX108);安徽省住房城乡建设科学技术计划项目“城市更新条例及配套政策体系研究”(2023-RK005);安徽省优秀青年教师培育项目(YQYB2024034)。
摘 要:基于观察纵向时间轴和纵向立法体系的纵观论,深入新中国成立以来城市更新立法的四个发展阶段,从中提取出我国城市更新法律体系存在的立法滞后、于法无据、低法律位阶三种参差,剖析得出其中的成因包括立法权限、立法需求、国家政策导向依赖三种原因。针对以上难点和堵点,需要将城市更新制度规范从法外循环回归法内系统构建立法体系。应然层面上应当以制定城市更新国家统一立法为最终目标,实然层面上时机不够成熟,应以发展论而非静态视域观之,通过“分步式”立法模式动态实现。Comprehensively observing the vertical timeline and the vertical legislative system,this paper probes into the four stages in urban renewal legislation since the foundation of the People’s Republic of China.It extracts three types of differences in the vertical legal system of China’s urban renewal,namely,legislative lag,lack of legal basis,and low legal rank.This mainly results from a heavy reliance on the legislative authority,legislative demands,and the national policy orientation.In view of these difficulties and blockages,it is necessary to return the urban renewal system from its extralegal circulation to an intralegal system.At the level of necessity,the ultimate urban renewal goal is to formulate a nationally unified legislation system,while at the practical level,the timing is not appropriate now.A step-by-step legislative mode development is only achieved through a dynamic perspective and process instead of a static one.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.62