论我国民事诉讼当事人完整陈述机制  

On the Litigants Complete Statement Mechanism in Civil Litigation in China

作　　者：何煊 He Xuan(School of Economic Law,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China;Faculty of Law,University of Alberta,Edmonton T6G2H5,Canada)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学经济法学院 [2]阿尔伯塔大学

出　　处：《江苏大学学报(社会科学版)》2025年第2期94-104,124,共12页Journal of Jiangsu University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学项目青年基金(22YJC820026);国家留学基金委“国家建设高水平大学公派研究生项目”([2023]23)。

摘　　要：当前司法实践中,当事人陈述的运用具有无意识、无区分及无序化特征,削弱了当事人陈述制度的应有功能。当事人完整陈述机制作为民事证据制度的衍生构建,旨在促进诉讼当事人开展基于法律秩序的实践性商谈,减少法官在事实认定过程中的认识偏见,同时还能降低司法成本、遏制虚假陈述。该机制通过“法官主持主导”与“当事人参与配合”协作机制弥合规范与实践的罅隙,具体构建方式包括:完整陈述时机把握、完整陈述主体认定、完整陈述事项确定与完整陈述方式选择四个维度。In contemporary judicial practice,the litigants statements often exhibit unconscious,undifferentiated,and disordered characteristics,undermining the intended functionality of the judicial system.As an integral development within the civil evidence framework,the complete statement mechanism seeks to foster substantive negotiation between disputing litigants within a structured legal framework,mitigate judicial cognitive biases during fact-finding,reduce judicial costs,and deter false statements.This mechanism bridges the gap between normative legal principles and practical application through a cooperative framework characterized by“judge presiding and leading”and“litigants participating and cooperating”.Its practical implementation is structured through four key dimensions:the timing of statements,the identification of the litigants responsible for comprehensive statements,the determination of relevant subject matters,and the selection of appropriate modes for delivering complete statements.

关 键 词：当事人陈述 完整陈述机制 诉讼效益 构建方式 

分 类 号：DF72[政治法律—诉讼法学] DF712[政治法律—法学]