检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:余文清 YU Wenqing(Department of Law,Fujian Police College,Fuzhou Fujian 350007,China)
出 处:《辽宁警察学院学报》2025年第2期1-7,共7页Journal of Liaoning Police College
基 金:2023年福建省社科基金资助项目“大数据时代数字化行政的法治回应研究”(FJ2023BF051)。
摘 要:数字技术的广泛应用催生了数字警务治理模式,数字警务治理实践大规模展开。数字技术对公安治理实践有明显的赋能效应,但也产生了规则制定权的事实授权、公民权利侵蚀和警察自由裁量权限制等风险。引入融贯性理论,提出技术与法律相融贯的风险治理方案:一是价值融贯,即将作为“价值之治”的法治内嵌到数字警务框架,对数字警务的技术逻辑和系统进行价值重塑;二是规则融贯,重申作为“规则之治”的法治,构造注重技术的法律规则。The continuous advancement of technology in police development have given rise to a digital policing governance mode,and a series of digital policing governance practices have been launched on a large scale.Digital technology has a significant empowering effect on public security governance practices,but it also brings risks such as factual delegations of rulemaking power,erosion of civil rights and restriction of police discretionary power.This paper introduces the coherence theory and proposes a risk governance scheme of integrating technology and law:the first is the value coherence,which means embedding the rule of law as the“value governance”into the digital policing framework,reshaping the technological logic and system of digital policing;the second is the coherence of rules,reaffirming to the rule of law as the“rule of rules”,and constructing legal rules that focus on technology.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147