1885年中日《天津条约》再评价——兼与郭海燕、李育民教授商榷  

A Re-evaluation of the 1885 Sino-Japanese Treaty of Tianjin——Discussion with Professor Guo Haiyan and Li Yumin

作　　者：张礼恒[1] ZHANG Liheng

机构地区：[1]聊城大学历史文化学院,252003

出　　处：《历史教学问题》2025年第1期85-94,203,共11页History Research And Teaching

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“李鸿章外交档案汇集、整理与研究”(24&ZD275)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：1885年4月签订的《天津条约》是日本对华外交的一次胜利,清政府毕竟在军事领域作出了让步,日本据此实现了军事层面与中国在朝鲜地位的对等。但是,对于《天津条约》有关“撤兵”、“派兵”的规定决不能过分引申、过度解读,因为它充其量就是中日两国为避免冲突升级、战争爆发而达成的一份军事停战协议、一纸书面照会形式,并使中日战争的爆发迟滞了10年之久。条约签订后,既没有形成朝鲜为中日两属之国的状态,日本也没有坠入“属邦论”的陷阱,中朝宗藩关系并没有因此而崩溃,反而得到了空前的加强。The Treaty of Tianjin signed in April 1885 was a diplomatic victory for Japan in its relations with China,as the Qing government made concessions in the military field,thereby allowing Japan to achieve military parity with China in Korea.However,the provisions of the Treaty of Tianjin regarding "withdrawal of troops" and "dispatch of troops" should not be overextended or overly interpreted,as it was at most a military ceasefire agreement and a written note exchanged between China and Japan to avoid escalating conflicts and the outbreak of war,which delayed the outbreak of the Sino-Japanese War for ten years.After the signing of the treaty,Korea did not become a country jointly belonging to China and Japan,nor did Japan fall into the trap of the "vassal-state theory".The suzerain-vassal relationship between China and Korea did not collapse as a result,but was instead strengthened unprecedentedly.

关 键 词：《天津条约》 《朝鲜办法八条》 征韩论 属邦论 

分 类 号：G63[文化科学—教育学]