诉源治理的“减负”效应--政法逻辑与司法逻辑的竞争性视角  

Litigation Sources:A Competitive Perspective on the Political-Legal Logics and the Judicial Logic

作　　者：孙昊辰 张铨 王翔 SUN Haochen;ZHANG Quan;WANG Xiang(Zhou Enlai School of Government,Nankai University)

机构地区：[1]南开大学周恩来政府管理学院

出　　处：《公共管理评论》2024年第4期86-107,共22页China Public Administration Review

基　　金：司法部2024年度法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研项目青年课题"非诉讼纠纷解决机制的治理效能研究"(项目批准号:24SFB3006)的资助。

摘　　要：诉源治理是我国基于“枫桥经验”和多元解纷机制的制度性努力,是缓解人案矛盾与“诉讼爆炸”的有益尝试。然而在地方治理实践中,以“减负”为初衷的诉源治理反而时常陷入“增负”的困境。本研究从政法逻辑与司法逻辑的竞争性视角出发,选取C市W区人民法院为案例,深入挖掘基层诉源治理在实施过程中“欲减负却不能”背后的机制与逻辑。研究发现,政法逻辑与司法逻辑在诉源治理中相互影响,构建了横向和纵向的压力传导路径。在横向层面,“小权分散”与治理资源紧张引发了结构性压力;在纵向层面,上级的考核压力与基层“为民服务”的角色期望进一步加重了基层的负担。横纵交互的压力传导机制相互渗透、交织与碰撞,最终导致了诉源治理推行过程中的非预期效应。In recent years,the party and state have built a complete institutional framework to improve national governance capacity and the governance system at a strategic level.However,in the practice of local governance,the governance of litigation sources,with the original intention of“reducing the burdens”often ends up“increasing the burdens.”Why does governance of litigation sources,as an institutional measure aimed at reducing burdens,unexpectedly become an institutional obstacle that increases burdens in the practice of local governance,and why does this unexpected consequence occur?These are the core questions that are addressed in this article.In order to answer the above questions,this study looks at the case of the peoples court in W District of C City from a competitive perspective of the political and legal logics and the judicial logic to deeply explore the mechanisms and logics behind the inability to achieve a burden reduction during implementation of grassroots source governance.The article attempts to understand the deep structure and operational logic of litigation source governance in China in terms of the competition and interactions between the political and legal logics and the judicial logic.We hope to clarify the key position of litigation source governance in Chinas judicial governance system and to explain how it may help to build a more harmonious and just social order.We find that the political and legal logics and the judicial logic affect each other in the governance of litigation sources,and they influence each other in source governance,establishing both horizontal and vertical pressure transmission paths.At the horizontal level,the“decentralization of small powers”and the shortage of governance resources have created considerable structural pressures.At the vertical level,the assessment pressures by the higher authorities and the expectations for the grassroots to“serve the people”further deepen the burdens at the grassroots level.The horizontal and vertical mechanisms int

关 键 词：诉源治理 减负 政法逻辑 司法逻辑 法政治学 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]