认罪认罚从宽制度在监检协作中的适用与反思  

Application and Reflection of the Leniency System of Guilty Plea and PunishmentIn Supervision and Inspection Cooperation

作　　者：徐寅智 XU Yin-zhi(College of Political Science and Law,Sichuan University of Arts and Sciences,Dazhou 635000)

机构地区：[1]四川文理学院政法学院,四川达州635000

出　　处：《阴山学刊》2025年第2期51-59,共9页Yinshan Academic Journal

基　　金：四川省社会科学重点研究基地纪检监察研究中心、四川纪检监察学会高校分会2024年度项目资助“监察调查与刑事诉讼程序‘配合制约’机制中的衔接路径研究”(SCJ240410)。

摘　　要：作为宽严相济刑事政策在职务犯罪治理领域的进一步拓展,认罪认罚从宽制度在监检协作中,应维系职务案件办理自身特色与刑事司法实践原则的总体平衡。预期性收益在监察调查阶段相对明确,可促使涉案对象尽早认罪认罚并实现司法资源节约之目的,监察机关宜在遵循刑事诉讼司法规律的前提下,明晰“相对精确”的从宽收益,并通过本制度适用范围、情形的鼓励性认定导向,在实现“治病救人”矫正目的的同时,达成监检机关的追诉效能。协商程序的实质化构建、从宽建议效力在程序间的平衡递进、从宽裁量权限的严谨对待、涉案对象权益让渡的审慎考量是保障监检协作办案成果的关键。风险管控是防止本制度实施偏差的预警性手段,可通过证明标准的合理建构、控辩协商的边界控制、量刑优惠设定的多维考量三个步骤,来合理管控制度适用中的不当风险。As a further expansion of the criminal policy of balancing leniency and severity in the governance of job-related crimes,the leniency system for confession and punishment should maintain the overall balance between the characteristics of handling job-related cases and the principles of criminal justice practice in the cooperation between supervision and prosecution.The expected benefits are relatively clear during the supervision and investigation stage,which can encourage the involved parties to confess and accept punishment as soon as possible and achieve the goal of saving judicial resources.The supervisory authorities should clarify the“relatively accurate”lenient benefits while following the laws of criminal procedure and justice,and through the encouraging recognition of the scope and circumstances of this system,achieve the corrective purpose of“treating diseases and saving lives”while achieving the prosecution efficiency of the supervisory authorities.The substantive construction of the negotiation procedure,the balance and progression of the effectiveness of lenient suggestions between procedures,the rigorous treatment of lenient discretion,and the careful consideration of the transfer of rights and interests of the parties involved are the key to ensuring the results of supervision and inspection cooperation in case handling.Risk control is an early warning measure to prevent deviations in the implementation of this system.It can be achieved through three steps:reasonable construction of proof standards,boundary control of prosecution defense negotiations,and multidimensional consideration of sentencing preferences to reasonably control inappropriate risks in the application of the system.

关 键 词：认罪认罚从宽 监检协作 宽严相济 风险管控 控辩协商 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]