检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王勇权 沈红卫[1] WANG Yong-quan;SHEN Hong-wei(Law School,Hunan Normal University,Changsha 410081)
出 处:《阴山学刊》2025年第2期60-67,共8页Yinshan Academic Journal
摘 要:作为蕴含中国特色的刑事证据排除规则之一,不可靠证据规则旨在消除不可靠证据对案件事实认定的影响,防止冤假错案的出现。然而,不可靠证据规则在法律上与非法证据排除规则和瑕疵证据排除规则杂糅,且规则设置并不完善,使得规则构建的立法初衷未能充分实现。对于体系化建构,首先应该厘清规则背后的理论逻辑,在不改变原有一元制诉讼结构的前提下,把握住二分化阶层证据审查逻辑,进而在制度上解决已有实践问题,最终形成理论与制度协同的不可靠证据规则体系,为刑事证据排除规则整体体系化进程提供理论支撑。As one of the exclusionary rules of criminal evidence with Chinese characteristics,the rule of unreliable evidence aims to eliminate the influence of unreliable evidence on the determination of case facts and prevent the emergence of unjust,false and wrong cases.However,the rule of unreliable evidence is mixed with the rule of illegal evidence exclusion and the rule of defective evidence exclusion in law,and the rule setting is not perfect,which makes the original legislative intention of the rule construction not fully realized.For the systematization approach,we should firstly clarify the theoretical logic behind the rules,grasp the evidence review logic of two different classes without changing the original unitary litigation structure,and then solve the existing practical problems in the system,and finally form an unreliable evidence rule system with the coordination of theory and system,which provides theoretical support for the overall systematization process of criminal evidence exclusion rules.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7