图尔敏理论在诉讼论证中的适用性分析  

Applicability of Toulmin's Argumentation Theory in Legal Arguments during Litigation

作　　者：金立[1] 伍泓霏 Jin Li;Wu Hongfei(Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China)

机构地区：[1]浙江大学,浙江杭州310058

出　　处：《贵州警察学院学报》2025年第2期105-114,共10页Journal of Guizhou Police College

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“语用逻辑的深度拓展与应用研究”(19ZDA042)。

摘　　要：法律论证是逻辑应用的重要领域,严密的逻辑论证可以为司法实践减小阻力。将图尔敏理论应用在法律的诉讼论证领域,有助于细化论证流程,呈现各要素在论证过程中发挥的具体作用,使起、应、审三方的论证过程有更加明确的解释性,从而为高层次理论剖析提供清晰、可供辩论的结构支撑。从起、应、审三方主体的不同论证目的出发,探究图尔敏论证模型在证成、反驳、说服的论证过程中所发挥的分析和评价作用,剖析图尔敏论证理论在诉讼论证方面的适用性问题,不仅在一定程度上回应了依法治国背景下的司法需要,而且在深度发掘图尔敏论证理论的实践价值进而推动逻辑和法学理论的交叉研究上发挥了积极的作用。Legal argumentation is an important field of logical application,and the employment of rigorous logical arguments can reduce obstacles in judicial practice.Applying Toulmin's argumentation theory to legal arguments during litigation not only facilitates the refinement of the argumentation process but also presents the specific roles of each element in this process.It enhances the clarity and explicative nature of the argumentation by the prosecution,defense and judiciary,thereby providing a clear and suitable structural support for high-level theoretical analysis.By exploring different argumentative purposes of the three parties involved in litigation,this study examines the analytical and evaluative roles of Toulmin's model of argumentation in the processes of justification,refutation,and persuasion,and analyzes the applicability of Toulmin's theory in the legal arguments during litigation.Such an endeavor responds to the judicial requirements in the context of governing the country by law and explores the practical value of Toulmin's argumentation theory,thus exerting a positive influence on promoting the cross-disciplinary research on logic and legal theories.

关 键 词：图尔敏论证模型 诉讼论证 适用性 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]