检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨霖 YANG Lin
出 处:《河北法律职业教育》2025年第3期75-80,共6页HEBEI VOCATIONAL EDUCATION OF LAW
摘 要:环境污染是当前社会关注的重点问题,为了能够保护生态环境,不仅要从污染源头进行遏制,还要对环境损害行为给予严厉的惩处。刑事诉权与民事公益诉权以严重的环境损害行为为共同的适用对象,但是在具体应用两诉权时,未从立法层面给出明确的规定,如何处理两诉权的关系需要深入探索。基于此,从环境领域刑事诉权以及环境领域民事公益诉权的理论入手,深入探讨环境领域民事公益诉权对刑事诉权的协调需求,提出环境领域刑事诉权与民事公益诉权的协调路径,包括立法层面的完善、司法实践中的操作建议、法律价值层面的协同、加强环境领域的制度保障等,旨在实现两诉权的有效协调。Environmental pollution is a key issue of concern in today’s society.To protect the ecological en-vironment,it is essential not only to curb pollution at its source but also to impose severe penalties on environmental damage behaviors.Criminal litigation rights and civil public interest litigation rights share a common target:serious environmental damage behaviors.However,there is no clear legislative guidance on how to handle the relationship between these two types of litigation rights,necessitating in-depth exploration.Based on this,starting from the the-ories of criminal litigation rights and civil public interest litigation rights in the environmental field,this paper delves into the coordination needs of civil public interest litigation rights in relation to criminal litigation rights.It proposes coordination paths for criminal litigation rights and civil public interest litigation rights in the environmental field,including legislative improvements,operational recommendations for judicial practice,synergy at the level of legal values,and strengthening institutional safeguards in the environmental field.The aim is to achieve effective coordination between the two types of litigation rights.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.111.209