情感与伦理:对欧美跨学科文艺批评的反思  

Affect and Ethics:Reflections on Contemporary Euro-American Interdisciplinary Literary and Art Criticism

作　　者：张振 Zhang Zhen

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学文学院

出　　处：《中国文艺评论》2025年第3期101-113,I0003,共14页China Literature and Art Criticism

基　　金：2024年度国家社科基金艺术学重大项目“‘两个结合’与中国当代艺术理论创新研究”(项目批准号:24ZD02)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：1996年的“索卡尔诈文事件”不仅引发了围绕人文学科与自然科学展开的“科学大战”,而且唤起了文艺理论家对于文艺批评工作的自省。进入21世纪以来,欧美的文艺理论家针对20世纪后半叶的文艺批评方法开展了重评工作。法国理论家拉图尔,美国学术机构的塞吉维克、菲尔斯基等后批判理论家以及斯皮瓦克等文艺批评家分别从批评力度、情感维度以及伦理的视角反思批评家身份和批评方法等问题。跨学科的文艺批评在其限度上受到质疑的同时,也在新的情感结构、批评方法和批评话语中被激活,并被赋予新的使命。述评近年来欧美文艺批评理论界的新动向,对当下中国文艺评论的理论发展有一定启发意义。“The Sokal Affair”in 1996 had not only generated a“science war”in the disciplines of the humanities and sciences but also aroused sentiments of self-evaluation in the field of literary and art criticism.In the past twenty years or so literary and art critics questioned and reevaluated the dominant methods of literary criticism in the second half of the twentieth century.Bruno Latour,critics of the so-called postcritique discourse such as Eve Kosofsky Sedgewick and Rita Felski,and Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak have attended to the question of the literary and art criticism from the perspectives of the power of criticism,affect and ethics,respectively.The question of the limit of interdisciplinary studies is being proposed and at the same time new types of interdisciplinarity are being reactivated in the new horizon of critical mood,methods and discourse.

关 键 词：跨学科 文艺批评 后批判 情感理论 星球意识 

分 类 号：I20[文学—中国文学]