论星际交流中的“接收者待在”与“符号主体”  

On“Becoming-Receiver”and“Semiosis-Agent”in Interstellar Communication

作　　者：韩嘉祥 Han Jiaxiang(the College of Literature and Journalism,Sichuan University)

机构地区：[1]四川大学文学与新闻学院 [2]四川大学符号学-传媒学研究所

出　　处：《符号与传媒》2025年第1期125-140,共16页Signs & Media

基　　金：国家社科基金重大招标项目“当代艺术提出的重要美学问题研究”(20ZD049);国家社科基金重大招标项目“中华文化经典符号谱系整理与数字人文传播研究”(23&ZD212)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：近年来,太空探索随航天技术的发展进行了更广泛的实践,其中以沟通“异星智能体”为目的的被称为“星际交流”。然而,由于异星智能体迄今仍未被发现,星际交流便以思想实验和具体实践的纠缠身份存在;“意图接收者”在当下的“缺席”,也窄化了其意义阐发空间。本文试图从传播符号学的符号过程及符号指称方向对以星际交流为例的“接收者待在传播”进行特征描述与辨析,指出其在“人类中心主义”诟病外的更多意义:意图接收者的暂时缺席,并非增强发送者的传播主体地位;而是通过抽离作为内容的具体传播要素,凸显形式化的符号过程之主体性,让“符号主体”成为传播主体——这同样有助于回应人工智能中的“待在智能”问题。Recent advancements in space technology have significantly expanded the scope of space exploration,including interstellar communication aimed at potential extraterrestrial intelligence.However,the lack of evidence for such intelligence renders interstellar communication a complex interplay of thought experiments and practical undertakings.The current absence of an“intended receiver”imposes limitations on its interpretative framework.This paper examines“Becoming-Receiver Communication”,as exemplified by interstellar communication,through the lens of semiosis and referential dynamics within communication semiotics.It argues that,while often criticized as“anthropocentric”,this form of communication carries deeper implications.Specifically,the absence of an intended receiver does not amplify the sender’s dominance as the Communication-Subject.Instead,it highlights the intrinsic subjectivity of semiosis by abstracting away concrete content elements,thus allowing the“Semiosis-Agent”to emerge as the true Communication-Subject.Furthermore,this perspective provides valuable insights into addressing the“Becoming-Intelligence”issue within the context of artificial intelligence.

关 键 词：传播符号学 星际交流 符号主体 自我指涉 接收者待在 

分 类 号：G63[文化科学—教育学]