制度复杂性框架下企业新质生产力提升路径——以专精特新小巨人上市企业为例  

Institutional Complexity Framework and Enhancement Pathways for Enterprise New Quality Productive Forces:Taking SRDI Listed Enterprises as Examples

作　　者：师迪文 程德俊[1] 赖秀萍 SHI Diwen;CHENG Dejun;LAI Xiuping(Nanjing University,Nanjing 210093)

机构地区：[1]南京大学商学院,江苏南京210093

出　　处：《首都经济贸易大学学报》2025年第2期13-30,共18页Journal of Capital University of Economics and Business

基　　金：国家自然科学基金面上项目“基于社会资本的战略人力资本跨层次涌现及其管理机制研究”(72472070);国家自然科学基金面上项目“高绩效工作系统对个体双元的作用机理:战略人力资本的跨层次涌现”(72072084)。

摘　　要：企业新质生产力是实现社会经济高质量发展的关键动能。目前关于企业新质生产力的研究还处于概念界定的阶段,如何协同政府、市场、社会、专业机构等多方力量,促进企业新质生产力的涌现和发展是亟待研究的现实问题。基于制度复杂性框架,使用定性比较分析法,以专精特新小巨人上市企业为研究样本,考察影响企业新质生产力的制度要素组态并提炼相应的提升路径。研究结果显示:第一,存在3类提升企业新质生产力的制度组合,分别为“政府主导型”“政府引导、市场推动、专业合作型”和“政府引导、社会关注、专业合作型”;第二,政府引导要素对于提升企业新质生产力起到重要的战略指引作用;第三,不同的前因要素组合通过压力与资源双重路径促进企业新质生产力提升;第四,不同规模企业在新质生产力的提升路径上存在差异。研究结果有助于扩展企业新质生产力的内涵及其驱动因素的理论研究,对政府塑造新质生产力发展环境与企业转型升级具有重要的现实意义。This study constructs measurement indicators for enterprise innovative and high-quality productivity from the perspective of“input-output”and uses the data envelopment analysis method for calculation.Furthermore,under the framework of institutional complexity,this study employs fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis(fsQCA)as the methodology,examines the configuration effect of institutional explanatory variables on enterprise innovative and high-quality productivity by focusing on“specialized,refined,differentiated,and innovative little giant”listed enterprises in China.The study finds that no single institutional factor was identified as a necessary condition for high-quality productivity,emphasizing the importance of factor combinations.There exist three types of combinations of institutional driving factors to enhance enterprise innovative and high-quality productivity,namely“government-domination”,“government and market-driven-professional cooperation”,and“government,social attention-professional synergy”.Further analysis highlights several key findings.First,government guidance plays a universal and foundational role in all configurations,serving as both a strategic guide and a resource enabler for enterprises.Second,the coexistence of pressure(e.g.,market competition,social attention)and resource support(e.g.,government subsidies,professional collaborations)is critical for fostering high-quality productivity.These dual pathways ensure that enterprises have both the motivation and capacity to innovate.Third,institutional factors such as market competition and social attention,or government subsidies and professional collaborations,exhibit partial substitutability,enabling enterprises to achieve innovation through diverse mechanisms.Finally,firm size influences the choice of pathways:larger firms leverage diverse resources and institutional support,while smaller firms rely more heavily on government-led initiatives.Robustness checks through threshold adjustments confirmed the stability

关 键 词：企业新质生产力 制度复杂性 科技创新 专精特新小巨人企业 组态分析 

分 类 号：F270[经济管理—企业管理]