检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姜波[1] 刘佳昕 唐超[1] 胡豫 JIANG Bo;LIU Jiaxin;TANG Chao;HU Yu
出 处:《语言教育》2025年第1期19-27,129,130,共11页Language Education
基 金:2024年黑龙江省高等教育教学改革研究重点项目“新文科背景下《跨文化交际》课程思政实践与探索”(项目编号:SJGZB2024063);高等教育2024年度省教育科学规划重点课题“以《新视野大学英语》为例探究英语教材文化构建的问题与策略”(项目编号:GJB1424037)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:近年来,关于是否取消高考外语的讨论持续引发社会热议。本文从语料库批评话语分析的视角,以Wodak的话语策略为理论指导,通过分析知乎论坛关于“高考外语存废”讨论的关键词和索引行,揭示社会对高考外语的舆论导向及背后动机。结果显示建议废除高考外语的网友更关注母语文化以及外语实用性,建议保留高考外语的网友则认为应该珍惜学习外语的机会,而且外语有助于加强跨文化交流。本研究旨在为外语教育提供新的分析视角,推动外语教育向更加均衡、多元的方向发展。In recent years,discussions on whether to cancel college entrance examination for foreign languages or not have continued to spark social discussion.This article,from the perspective of corpusassisted criticism discourse analysis and under the guidance of Wodak's discursive strategy,reveals the public opinion of society towards the foreign language of the college entrance examination and its underlying motivations by analyzing the keywords and index lines of the Zhihu Forum's discussion on“retention or abolition of the foreign languages examination”.The results show that netizens who suggest abolishing the foreign language in the college entrance examination pay more attention to their mother tongue culture and the practicality of the foreign language.However,netizens who suggest retaining the foreign language in the college entrance examination believe that the foreign language in the college entrance examination can promote educational equity,avoid class rigidity,and strengthen cross-cultural communication.This study aims to provide a new analytical perspective for foreign language education and promote its development towards a more balanced and diverse direction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38