检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王子文[1] 张丽峰 王海琪[1] 国献丽[1] WANG Ziwen;ZHANG Lifeng;WANG Haiqi;GUO Xianli(Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of Jiading DistrictMaternal and Child Health Hospital of Shanghai,Shanghai 201821,China)
机构地区:[1]上海市嘉定区妇幼保健院妇保科,上海201821
出 处:《心理月刊》2025年第5期104-107,共4页
基 金:嘉定区科技委员会项目(JDKW-2022-0022)。
摘 要:目的 探究初中生认知情绪调节策略的潜在类别,以及这些类别与心理健康的关系。方法 2022年6月~2022年9月,采用方便整群取样法选取上海市某区6所中学的1 136名学生,采用认知情绪调节策略问卷、儿童抑郁自评量表、焦虑症筛查量表、满意度量表进行问卷调查,并采用潜在剖面分析、方差分析、稳健三步法对数据进行处理。结果 青少年认知情绪调节策略分为低调节型(6.07%)、高调节型(16.55%)、适应调节型(19.54%)和非适应调节型(57.83%)4个潜在类别。不同认知情绪调节潜在类型的中学生在焦虑、抑郁、满意度上差异均有统计学意义(λ^(2)=54.790、117.830、168.321,P<0.001)。4个类型在心理健康上具有不同表现,高调节型(4.70±0.46)与非适应调节型(3.44±0.15)焦虑得分高于低调节型(1.73±0.41)和适应调节型(1.35±0.14);非适应调节型(9.55±0.24)和低调节型(8.15±0.90)高调节型(8.56±0.56)抑郁得分多于适应调节型(3.66±0.21);适应调节型者满意度得分最高(28.97±0.37)。结论 初中生的认知情绪调节策略存异质性,其心理健康状态也不同,相关工作人员应制定针对性措施以提升其心理健康。Objective To explore the potential categories of cognitive emotion regulation strategies for junior middle school students and their relationship with mental health.Methods From June to September 2022,a convenience cluster sampling method was used to select 1136 students from 6 junior middle schools in Shanghai.A questionnaire survey was conducted using cognitive emotion regulation strategy questionnaire,children's depression self-assessment scale,anxiety screening scale,and satisfaction scale.Potential profile analysis,variance analysis,and robust three-step method were used to process the data.Results The cognitive and emotional regulation strategies of adolescents were divided into four potential categories:low regulation(6.07%),high regulation(16.55%),adaptive regulation(19.54%),and non adaptive regulation(57.83%).There were statistically significant differences in anxiety,depression,and satisfaction among middle school students with different potential types of cognitive emotion regulation(a2-54.790,117.830,168.321,P<0.001).The four types have different manifestations in mental health,the anxiety scores of high regulation type(4.70±0.46)and non adaptive regulation type(3.44±0.15)were higher than those of low regulation type(1.73±0.41)and adaptive regulation type(1.35±0.14).The depression scores of non adaptive regulation type(9.55±0.24),low regulation type(8.15±0.90),and high regulation type(8.56±0.56)were higher than those of adaptive regulation type(3.66±0.21).The satisfaction score of adaptive adjustment type was the highest(28.97±0.37).Conclusion There is heterogeneity in the cognitive and emotional regulation strategies of junior high school students,and students with different types of regulation strategies have different mental health problems.Attention should be paid to non adaptive and low-key junior high school students,and effective measures should be developed to improve their mental health.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249