基于AHP-TOPSIS模型的“数学建模”课程思政的成效分析  

Analysis on the Ideological and Political Effect of Mathematical Modeling Course Based on AHP-TOPSIS Model

作　　者：孙娓娓 孙怀波 李俊林 SUN Weiwei;SUN Huaibo;LI Junlin(School of Mathematics and Statistics,Fuyang Normal University,Fuyang Anhui 236037)

机构地区：[1]阜阳师范大学数学与统计学院,安徽阜阳236037

出　　处：《湖北理工学院学报》2025年第2期73-77,共5页Journal of Hubei Polytechnic University

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目(项目编号:62303118);安徽省教学研究项目(项目编号:2021jyxm1109,2022jyxm1161,2022jyxm1167);安徽省高校自然科学研究重点项目(项目编号:2023AH050413,2023AH050429);阜阳师范大学博士科研基金项目(项目编号:2021KYQD0037)。

摘　　要：近年来,高校“数学建模”课程思政开展得如火如荼,但教学效果却大不相同,如何进行科学评价显得尤为重要。文章从课程思政的目标、内容、过程、效果4个维度构建“数学建模”课程思政评价体系,采用层次分析法(AHP)求解所选各级评价指标的权重,发现思政效果的权重明显高于其他3个指标。用TOPSIS法建立“数学建模”课程思政综合评估模型,给出教师课程思政评价优劣的量化结果,从挖掘教材思政元素、思政元素贯穿教学情境、构建全面课程评价体系3个方面对提高“数学建模”课程思政效果提出了建议。In recent years,while ideological and political education(IPE)in Mathematical Modeling courses has been vigorously implemented in Chinese universities,significant variations in teaching effectiveness necessitate scientific evaluation approaches.This study constructs an IPE evaluation system for Mathematical Modeling course through four dimensions:objectives,content,process,and outcomes.Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP),the weights of multi-level evaluation indicators are calculated,revealing that the IPE outcomes dimension holds significantly higher weighting than the other three dimensions.The TOPSIS method is subsequently applied to establish a comprehensive evaluation model,generating quantifiable assessments of instructors′IPE performance.Three strategic recommendations are proposed:(1)Deepening the integration of IPE elements within course materials;(2)Embedding ideological-political themes throughout instructional scenarios;(3)Establishing a multi-dimensional course evaluation framework.

关 键 词：课程思政 “数学建模”课程 层次分析法 TOPSIS法 

分 类 号：O29[理学—应用数学]