检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭盛楠[1] 郝洋[1] 王芳[1] GUO Shengnan;HAO Yang;WANG Fang(Journal Center,Institute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion,China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences,100700,Beijing,China)
机构地区:[1]中国中医科学院针灸研究所《世界针灸杂志》编辑部,北京100700
出 处:《科技与出版》2025年第2期59-69,共11页Science-Technology & Publication
基 金:中国科学技术期刊编辑学会2023—2024年度基金项目(CESSP-2023-D24);中国针灸学会“特色一流学会”建设项目。
摘 要:文章基于中医药领域160位研究者,开展研究者科学数据共享与出版意识现状与提升路径的横断面调查研究,明晰现阶段我国研究者对科学数据相关概念的认知程度,明确研究者科学数据共享与出版的意识水平与层次,了解研究者获取相关知识、提高相应意识的方式与途径。调查结果提示,现阶段我国研究者对科学数据的认知停留在表面,认识较为浅表;对科学数据的存储和保管较为朴素、原始;对科学数据共享与出版抱有谨慎的开放态度;对科学数据共享与出版的知识积累与意识觉醒源于实践。提升我国研究者科学数据共享与出版意识,应该充分发挥科技期刊编辑在推进科学数据共享与出版中的领路作用,同时对研究者开展多种形式的培训,扩大数据共享与出版实践,抓住研究者的核心关切,以点带面推动科学数据共享,如此将加快推进科学数据共享与出版进程,顺应开放科学发展大势。Based on a cross-sectional survey of 160 researchers in the field of traditional Chinese medicine,this paper investigates the status quo of researchers'awareness regarding scientific data sharing and publishing,as well as pathways for improvement.It elucidates the extent of understanding to the concepts related to scientific data at the present stage for the Chinese researchers in the traditional Chinese medicine field,clarifies their awareness level,and examines the means and approaches through which researchers acquire relevant knowledge.The results indicate that the respondents’cognition of scientific data is relatively superficial.The storage and regulation of scientific data are relatively simple and primitive.The respondents exhibit caution regarding sharing and publishing of scientific data.The knowledge accumulation and awareness of scientific data sharing and publishing primarily stem from practical experience.To enhance openness in scientific data sharing and publishing,three strategies are proposed in this paper.First,it is important to leverage the leading role of editors in the scientific,technological,and medical(STM)journals to foster researchers'understanding of scientific data and optimize their data management practices.Close communication between editors and researchers in daily work can provide researchers with relevant knowledge of scientific data,while editors'requirements for scientific data management can encourage researchers to upgrade their data management models.Second,various forms of training for researchers should be implemented to gradually improve researchers'cautious attitude towards open data,and expand data-sharing and publishing practices.The sharing and publishing of scientific data rely on the understanding and recognition of frontline researchers.Increasing the frequency of training and enriching the training topics can enhance researchers'engagement and ultimately influence publishing practices.Third,it is essential to address the interests that researchers prioritize,st
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49